Editing Talk:Sharon Valerii/Archive1
Discussion page of Sharon Valerii/Archive1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The article lists her as a Lieutenant JG, but according to [http://galactica.emedian.net/ep1.12.html these pictures] she wears the same rank insignia as Starbuck. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 22:38, 7 December 2005 (EST) | The article lists her as a Lieutenant JG, but according to [http://galactica.emedian.net/ep1.12.html these pictures] she wears the same rank insignia as Starbuck. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 22:38, 7 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:Does anyone have a source on the Lt. J.G. business? --[[User: | :Does anyone have a source on the Lt. J.G. business? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:46, 7 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::Per Moore's blog entry, the rank seems to exist, and in the miniseries, Starbuck notes Helo's "flying with rooks", indicating that Boomer is a new pilot. Then again, by the time she's done with basic officer training and flight school she very well may have made it all the way up to full Lieutenant. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 23:11, 7 December 2005 (EST) | ::Per Moore's blog entry, the rank seems to exist, and in the miniseries, Starbuck notes Helo's "flying with rooks", indicating that Boomer is a new pilot. Then again, by the time she's done with basic officer training and flight school she very well may have made it all the way up to full Lieutenant. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 23:11, 7 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:::Kat is definitely an Lt. J.G., as per her caption in "[[Final Cut]]". Maybe someone can get a capture of her insignia. --[[User: | :::Kat is definitely an Lt. J.G., as per her caption in "[[Final Cut]]". Maybe someone can get a capture of her insignia. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:16, 7 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::::Boomer was a Lieutenant Junior Grade, because she was a new pilot and Lt. J.G. was the lowest officer rank (all pilots are officers). We knew Starbuck is a full Lieutenant because she's the highest ranking pilot after Apollo. I don't know what the frak you're talking about with these 'pictures'; you can't make out a clear shot of their rank insignia in any of them. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 23:59, 7 December 2005 (EST) | ::::Boomer was a Lieutenant Junior Grade, because she was a new pilot and Lt. J.G. was the lowest officer rank (all pilots are officers). We knew Starbuck is a full Lieutenant because she's the highest ranking pilot after Apollo. I don't know what the frak you're talking about with these 'pictures'; you can't make out a clear shot of their rank insignia in any of them. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 23:59, 7 December 2005 (EST) | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:OH come on, don't we all remember then endless rank-pip mix ups on ''Star Trek''?; in '''no way''' should we alter PRE-EXISTING biographical information due to insignia on their collars in a stray scene or two. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 10:54, 8 December 2005 (EST) | :OH come on, don't we all remember then endless rank-pip mix ups on ''Star Trek''?; in '''no way''' should we alter PRE-EXISTING biographical information due to insignia on their collars in a stray scene or two. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 10:54, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::Yeah, but we still need a ''source'' on Sharon's Lt. J.G. status if we're going to argue against on screen evidence. Has she ever actually be referred to as such? --[[User: | ::Yeah, but we still need a ''source'' on Sharon's Lt. J.G. status if we're going to argue against on screen evidence. Has she ever actually be referred to as such? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:29, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::It's not a stray scene or two—it's every scene. Someone with HD captures or the DVDs should verify but in every picture I've seen, Boomer wears that same insignia, and so does Starbuck. And it's not just the insignia—it's the label on her uniform collar. | ::It's not a stray scene or two—it's every scene. Someone with HD captures or the DVDs should verify but in every picture I've seen, Boomer wears that same insignia, and so does Starbuck. And it's not just the insignia—it's the label on her uniform collar. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[File:Valeriisharonlt.png|frame|right|The collar of Lt. Valerii's uniform jacket is labeled with her name, serial number, and rank. ("[[Water]]")]]I updated the picture. I'd still say that the preponderence of evidence (considering Boomer's uniform collar in "Water") indicates she's a full Lieutenant, barring any additional evidence to the contrary. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 15:34, 8 December 2005 (EST) | [[File:Valeriisharonlt.png|frame|right|The collar of Lt. Valerii's uniform jacket is labeled with her name, serial number, and rank. ("[[Water]]")]]I updated the picture. I'd still say that the preponderence of evidence (considering Boomer's uniform collar in "Water") indicates she's a full Lieutenant, barring any additional evidence to the contrary. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 15:34, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:If the full Lt. and Lt. J.G. insignia are the same, then what do we have to go on? --[[User: | :If the full Lt. and Lt. J.G. insignia are the same, then what do we have to go on? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:43, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::This image. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 15:48, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ::This image. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 15:48, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:::Which image? --[[User: | :::Which image? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:56, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::::Sorry, got it uploaded now. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 16:08, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ::::Sorry, got it uploaded now. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 16:08, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:::::Seems credible. --[[User: | :::::Seems credible. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:13, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:Boomer's insignia in the picture above (left side) looks different. On all the other Lt. pins, there is a diamond and the ends of the chevron protrude beyond it but on the pin of Boomer's right side (our left) it looks like the chevron doesn't protrude, leaving it a plain diamond. One other thing is in the Mini, Boomer's Raptor is marked "JRLIEUTENANT SHARON VALERII." --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 11:36, 14 December 2005 (EST) | :Boomer's insignia in the picture above (left side) looks different. On all the other Lt. pins, there is a diamond and the ends of the chevron protrude beyond it but on the pin of Boomer's right side (our left) it looks like the chevron doesn't protrude, leaving it a plain diamond. One other thing is in the Mini, Boomer's Raptor is marked "JRLIEUTENANT SHARON VALERII." --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 11:36, 14 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::In "Water" before Sharon launches to find water, at 0:26:16, her rank insignia catches the light and you can see that the insignia is a diamond with no protrusions from the chevrons. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 12:59, 14 December 2005 (EST) | ::In "Water" before Sharon launches to find water, at 0:26:16, her rank insignia catches the light and you can see that the insignia is a diamond with no protrusions from the chevrons. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 12:59, 14 December 2005 (EST) | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
In light of what was revealed in Downloaded, the main Sharon Valerii article was renamed [[Number Eight]]. I think that this article should be renamed to simply Sharon Valerii, as this copy is the only one who was actually given that name. Could be ambiguous with [[Sharon Valerii (Caprica copy)]] though. Caprica-Eight is another possibility. --[[User:Undc23|Undc23]] 22:09, 25 February 2006 (EST) | In light of what was revealed in Downloaded, the main Sharon Valerii article was renamed [[Number Eight]]. I think that this article should be renamed to simply Sharon Valerii, as this copy is the only one who was actually given that name. Could be ambiguous with [[Sharon Valerii (Caprica copy)]] though. Caprica-Eight is another possibility. --[[User:Undc23|Undc23]] 22:09, 25 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:I disagree. They both call themselves Sharon Valerii, they both have a right to that name. The current naming system is unambiguous. --[[User: | :I disagree. They both call themselves Sharon Valerii, they both have a right to that name. The current naming system is unambiguous. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:43, 26 February 2006 (EST) | ||
Agreed. If one called herself Sharon and one called herself Eight, or Boomer, that would be a different story- but they are both referred to as "Sharon" and therefore, the naming system should remain. It doesn't matter that she's an Eight- she doesn't think of herself as such. [[User:Ragestorm|Ragestorm]] 10:31, 26 February 2006 (EST) | Agreed. If one called herself Sharon and one called herself Eight, or Boomer, that would be a different story- but they are both referred to as "Sharon" and therefore, the naming system should remain. It doesn't matter that she's an Eight- she doesn't think of herself as such. [[User:Ragestorm|Ragestorm]] 10:31, 26 February 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
I think this article should either be moved to "Sharon 'Boomer' Valerii" or "Sharon Valerii ('Boomer')". Anyone who still has problems to tell them apart, will probably be even more confused by "(Galactica copy)", especially because the article for Caprica-Sharon has already be moved to "Sharon Agathon". Aside from that, it seems apparent that the writers are often using Grace Park's nomenclature on the show now − Galactica-Sharon was called "Boomer" by a Three model in the season premiere, while Caprica-Sharon is called "Sharon" exclusively − therefore I think it would be a good idea to use "Boomer" in the name of this article. It would be far less confusing than "(Galactica copy)", IMHO. -- [[User:Enemy|Enemy]] 18:07, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | I think this article should either be moved to "Sharon 'Boomer' Valerii" or "Sharon Valerii ('Boomer')". Anyone who still has problems to tell them apart, will probably be even more confused by "(Galactica copy)", especially because the article for Caprica-Sharon has already be moved to "Sharon Agathon". Aside from that, it seems apparent that the writers are often using Grace Park's nomenclature on the show now − Galactica-Sharon was called "Boomer" by a Three model in the season premiere, while Caprica-Sharon is called "Sharon" exclusively − therefore I think it would be a good idea to use "Boomer" in the name of this article. It would be far less confusing than "(Galactica copy)", IMHO. -- [[User:Enemy|Enemy]] 18:07, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I agree. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:13, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | :I agree. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:13, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I want to wait until we learn Sharon Agathon's callsign. If she uses "Boomer" too, then the move won't work. --[[User: | ::I want to wait until we learn Sharon Agathon's callsign. If she uses "Boomer" too, then the move won't work. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:17, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::Her callsign was actually revealed in the last issue of the BSG Magazine :) --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 19:38, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | :::Her callsign was actually revealed in the last issue of the BSG Magazine :) --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 19:38, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::And it is...? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 19:39, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::And it is...? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 19:39, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::::She is mentioned, in the magazine, as "Sharon 'Athena' Agathon" --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 19:41, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | :::::She is mentioned, in the magazine, as "Sharon 'Athena' Agathon" --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 19:41, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::Awesome. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 20:29, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::::Awesome. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 20:29, 26 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::::::I still want to wait for an on-screen reference, or at least official confirmation from RDM or Brad Thompson. The Magazine has been wrong on prior occasions. --[[User: | :::::::I still want to wait for an on-screen reference, or at least official confirmation from RDM or Brad Thompson. The Magazine has been wrong on prior occasions. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:34, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::::Yeah, I'm not saying we put it yet, it is after all, a spoiler of sorts for now. I'd trust it though, this issue had very good interviews (and this was in an interview). Though I don't know in which episode we'll find out. --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 06:29, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::::::Yeah, I'm not saying we put it yet, it is after all, a spoiler of sorts for now. I'd trust it though, this issue had very good interviews (and this was in an interview). Though I don't know in which episode we'll find out. --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 06:29, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:The article should probably be renamed [[Sharon Valerii]] as we don't include callsigns in the article's name. Obviously, we may have to go through the articles and fix links, but that shouldn't be a big to-do. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 07:07, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | :The article should probably be renamed [[Sharon Valerii]] as we don't include callsigns in the article's name. Obviously, we may have to go through the articles and fix links, but that shouldn't be a big to-do. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 07:07, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
:::Eights, actually. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 07:23, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | :::Eights, actually. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 07:23, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::Eights, fives, whatever. They'll kill us all (but they're gonna frak us first, see?...frak us ''real slow''...) :) --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 07:46, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::Eights, fives, whatever. They'll kill us all (but they're gonna frak us first, see?...frak us ''real slow''...) :) --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 07:46, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I disagree, for reasons stated above. They were both "Sharon Valerii" for the first 33 episodes. Someone watching the first two seasons and searching for "Sharon Valerii" needs to be sent to a disambig page, not the page for a particular copy. --[[User: | ::I disagree, for reasons stated above. They were both "Sharon Valerii" for the first 33 episodes. Someone watching the first two seasons and searching for "Sharon Valerii" needs to be sent to a disambig page, not the page for a particular copy. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:18, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::Then "Sharon Valerii" should be a disambig or redirect to [[Number Eight]]. The current Boomer page should be renamed similarly to "<nowiki>[[Number Eight (Boomer)]]</nowiki>", but anything other than the human alias. Else, we concise the Number Five article and merge the also-concised Galactica-copy article into Number Five. A differentiation must be done; the Sharons have both served and are alike from a wiki perspective same their name. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:10, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | :::Then "Sharon Valerii" should be a disambig or redirect to [[Number Eight]]. The current Boomer page should be renamed similarly to "<nowiki>[[Number Eight (Boomer)]]</nowiki>", but anything other than the human alias. Else, we concise the Number Five article and merge the also-concised Galactica-copy article into Number Five. A differentiation must be done; the Sharons have both served and are alike from a wiki perspective same their name. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:10, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::The best name would be Sharon Valerii ("Boomer"). -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:23, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::The best name would be Sharon Valerii ("Boomer"). -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:23, 27 October 2006 (CDT) | ||