Editing Talk:Scar (Raider)/Archive 1
Discussion page of Scar (Raider)/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --[[User: | Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST) | :I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Article name == | == Article name == | ||
Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. | Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. | ||
== Article name == | |||
Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST) | |||