Editing Talk:Resurrection Ship/Archive 1
Discussion page of Resurrection Ship/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:::::::It looks very much like a Gothic cathedral to me, to the point of having thought of the resemblence before; the symbolism is really rather cute. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 19:30, 29 June 2006 (CDT) | :::::::It looks very much like a Gothic cathedral to me, to the point of having thought of the resemblence before; the symbolism is really rather cute. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 19:30, 29 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User: | :::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:::::I think we should wait for Ragnar Anchorage or someone else to post better caps, if by the end of today no one has, I'll give a link to a site that does have them up already, though they are smaller (by format) than the ones RA normally posts..--[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 7 January 2006 | :::::I think we should wait for Ragnar Anchorage or someone else to post better caps, if by the end of today no one has, I'll give a link to a site that does have them up already, though they are smaller (by format) than the ones RA normally posts..--[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 7 January 2006 | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Is there either a suitable nomenclature to refer to any Cylon with a biological component? Since the resurrection ship can download both Humano-Cylons and Raiders, I wanted a way to refer to both with a single term. Bio-Cylon seemed appropriate, though I now see it's already been negatively hijacked by original series purists. Other than the blurb I added at the end, this article refers exclusively to the resurrection of the humanoid form, which, we now know from "[[Scar]]", is technically insufficient. I wouldn't want to clutter up the entire article with the hybrid reference; a single clarification would suffice. I don't think my addition quite does the trick, though. --[[User:Timtrout|Timtrout]] 02:33, 7 February 2006 (EST) | Is there either a suitable nomenclature to refer to any Cylon with a biological component? Since the resurrection ship can download both Humano-Cylons and Raiders, I wanted a way to refer to both with a single term. Bio-Cylon seemed appropriate, though I now see it's already been negatively hijacked by original series purists. Other than the blurb I added at the end, this article refers exclusively to the resurrection of the humanoid form, which, we now know from "[[Scar]]", is technically insufficient. I wouldn't want to clutter up the entire article with the hybrid reference; a single clarification would suffice. I don't think my addition quite does the trick, though. --[[User:Timtrout|Timtrout]] 02:33, 7 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:The matter was under fairly heated discussion recently. [[Humano-Cylon]] is the term currently in use, but I expect this to change in the near future. --[[User: | :The matter was under fairly heated discussion recently. [[Humano-Cylon]] is the term currently in use, but I expect this to change in the near future. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:42, 7 February 2006 (EST) | ||
::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST) | ::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:::No. From what we gathered in "Resurrection Ship, part I" the Res Ship was built ''after'' Galactica escaped outside of the range of the Cylon homeworld.--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 19:48, 25 February 2006 (EST) | :::No. From what we gathered in "Resurrection Ship, part I" the Res Ship was built ''after'' Galactica escaped outside of the range of the Cylon homeworld.--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 19:48, 25 February 2006 (EST) | ||
::::Thats not true, it wasn't built just for that. We don't actually get the direct Cylon Explanation, but the ship is too massive to build in that short amount of time. They already had the ship. --[[ | ::::Thats not true, it wasn't built just for that. We don't actually get the direct Cylon Explanation, but the ship is too massive to build in that short amount of time. They already had the ship. --[[Sauron18|Sauron18]] 25 February 2006 | ||
:::::We have no idea how long it would take the Cylons to build a Resurrection Ship. It's very possible they built it after Galactica's escape. --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 20:11, 25 February 2006 (EST) | :::::We have no idea how long it would take the Cylons to build a Resurrection Ship. It's very possible they built it after Galactica's escape. --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 20:11, 25 February 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
The "Shadowed" one is the screencap from the actual episode. He's also got a neat model of old Ressy. Either way, it could always go in a BTS section, or just be mentioned, but I thought it looked perfect. It doesn't have the tub, but it's still the room. I dunno. --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 01:33 26 June 2006 | The "Shadowed" one is the screencap from the actual episode. He's also got a neat model of old Ressy. Either way, it could always go in a BTS section, or just be mentioned, but I thought it looked perfect. It doesn't have the tub, but it's still the room. I dunno. --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 01:33 26 June 2006 | ||
:I don't believe there's any indication that this room is on board the Resurrection Ship. --[[User: | :I don't believe there's any indication that this room is on board the Resurrection Ship. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:18, 26 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Yeah, for all we know her consciousness just got stored and woke up later. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 07:29, 26 June 2006 (CDT) | ::Yeah, for all we know her consciousness just got stored and woke up later. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 07:29, 26 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
Hey, I was wondering, and have been for a while, if perhaps we should use Alain Rivard's render of the Resurrection Ship as a main picture? | Hey, I was wondering, and have been for a while, if perhaps we should use Alain Rivard's render of the Resurrection Ship as a main picture? | ||
[[ | [[Image:Resurrection Ship.jpg|thumb|right|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]] | ||
It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST) | It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST) | ||
: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST) | : Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:: Cool. --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 21:35, 23 January 2007 (CST) | :: Cool. --[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 21:35, 23 January 2007 (CST) | ||