Editing Talk:Red Squadron (RDM)/Archive 1
Discussion page of Red Squadron (RDM)/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think this should be either deleted or merged, because ''Pegasus'' just used that terminology all the time: in the episode "Pegasus" they referred to "Blue team" and "Red team", etc. I ''think'' that these are *temporary* designations, like during the Battle of theb Tylium Asteroid, Galactica referred to "Strike Group 1" and Strike Group 2", but these were not permanent names. **I myself am confused by this. However, my two cents, I myself THINK that they're just temporary designations. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 03:30, 18 February 2006 (EST) | I think this should be either deleted or merged, because ''Pegasus'' just used that terminology all the time: in the episode "Pegasus" they referred to "Blue team" and "Red team", etc. I ''think'' that these are *temporary* designations, like during the Battle of theb Tylium Asteroid, Galactica referred to "Strike Group 1" and Strike Group 2", but these were not permanent names. **I myself am confused by this. However, my two cents, I myself THINK that they're just temporary designations. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 03:30, 18 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:Actually, it may be a more permanent group than just a "strike team". Remember that ''Galactica'' has only had a single squadron of able pilots until now. ''Pegasus'' appears to have several. --[[User: | :Actually, it may be a more permanent group than just a "strike team". Remember that ''Galactica'' has only had a single squadron of able pilots until now. ''Pegasus'' appears to have several. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 05:08, 18 February 2006 (EST) | ||
::Lets wait for more info. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 05:16, 18 February 2006 (EST) | ::Lets wait for more info. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 05:16, 18 February 2006 (EST) | ||
: <font style="color: #bbccbb;">I'm beginning to get the impression,</font> through careful examination of this episode and previous episodes, that the use of colours — Red, Blue, Green, Yellow — correlates to wireless-com designations, and isn't a ''formal'' delineation between groups/squadrons. It would appear that ''Pegasus'', indeed all battlestars, have a pool of pilots that are assigned to flights. Those flights are ''per'' battlestar. Such that, ''Pegasus'' has a Red, a Blue, a Green, a Yellow. ''Galactica'' has a Red, a Blue, etc. (if a ship of her age has an equal capacity to ''Mercury''-class battlestars is not quite yet known). Heck, if battlestar ''Hector'' (completely arbitrary name) was to show up, the safe bet is that it too would have a Red, a Blue, a Green, and a Yellow. '''The colour-name is not unique.''' | : <font style="color: #bbccbb;">I'm beginning to get the impression,</font> through careful examination of this episode and previous episodes, that the use of colours & mdash; Red, Blue, Green, Yellow — correlates to wireless-com designations, and isn't a ''formal'' delineation between groups/squadrons. It would appear that ''Pegasus'', indeed all battlestars, have a pool of pilots that are assigned to flights. Those flights are ''per'' battlestar. Such that, ''Pegasus'' has a Red, a Blue, a Green, a Yellow. ''Galactica'' has a Red, a Blue, etc. (if a ship of her age has an equal capacity to ''Mercury''-class battlestars is not quite yet known). Heck, if battlestar ''Hector'' (completely arbitrary name) was to show up, the safe bet is that it too would have a Red, a Blue, a Green, and a Yellow. '''The colour-name is not unique.''' | ||
:Are there other clues? Yes. In this episode especially, Starbuck "assigns" section/squadron "leads" ''on the fly''. If these colour groups were actually ''formal'' entities, it would stand to reason they would have a formal internal structure, with their own squadron leader, and second, and so forth. Those positions would not be assigned by the overall group leader, nor defined in action. Instead, the overall group leader (Starbuck, in this example) would say, "Lima (arbitrary name), take '''''your''''' flight/squadron/unit that way... " instead of "Lima, take Green that way." Make sense? | :Are there other clues? Yes. In this episode especially, Starbuck "assigns" section/squadron "leads" ''on the fly''. If these colour groups were actually ''formal'' entities, it would stand to reason they would have a formal internal structure, with their own squadron leader, and second, and so forth. Those positions would not be assigned by the overall group leader, nor defined in action. Instead, the overall group leader (Starbuck, in this example) would say, "Lima (arbitrary name), take '''''your''''' flight/squadron/unit that way... " instead of "Lima, take Green that way." Make sense? | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:If anything, this article could/should be merged or re-categorized into "terminology", <font style="color: #bbccbb;">and explained as wireless terminology used in flight operations.</font> -- [[User:Hawke|Hawke]] 01:09, 21 February 2006 (EST) | :If anything, this article could/should be merged or re-categorized into "terminology", <font style="color: #bbccbb;">and explained as wireless terminology used in flight operations.</font> -- [[User:Hawke|Hawke]] 01:09, 21 February 2006 (EST) | ||