Editing Talk:Race and Ethnicity in the Twelve Colonies/Archive 1
Discussion page of Race and Ethnicity in the Twelve Colonies/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Why are they listed as being a couple? [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 17:24, 28 August 2005 (EDT) | Why are they listed as being a couple? [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 17:24, 28 August 2005 (EDT) | ||
:She checked out his ass in [[Resistance]], and RDM indicated on the podcast that this was a hint for the second half of the season. It's listed with the same level of surety as Baltar's interest in Boomer, anyway. --[[User: | :She checked out his ass in [[Resistance]], and RDM indicated on the podcast that this was a hint for the second half of the season. It's listed with the same level of surety as Baltar's interest in Boomer, anyway. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:31, 28 August 2005 (EDT) | ||
== Playa Palacios == | == Playa Palacios == | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
The point of this section was to explore attitudes toward race and sexuality in the colonies. Stating that some characters don't display a preference one way or another is senseless, since, as established in the paragraph above, this appears to be the default. I understand your desire to change the wording to reflect the facts of the case, but really, I think the better solution here is to change the focus on the evidence within the section to better explore the topic it was meant to. | The point of this section was to explore attitudes toward race and sexuality in the colonies. Stating that some characters don't display a preference one way or another is senseless, since, as established in the paragraph above, this appears to be the default. I understand your desire to change the wording to reflect the facts of the case, but really, I think the better solution here is to change the focus on the evidence within the section to better explore the topic it was meant to. | ||
Basically, your point about Baltar is sound, and this means he should be removed from the section entirely. Thrace, I think, still stands, as she's had at least four sexual encounters with a person of predominantly European decent, and not a single one with anyone else. --[[User: | Basically, your point about Baltar is sound, and this means he should be removed from the section entirely. Thrace, I think, still stands, as she's had at least four sexual encounters with a person of predominantly European decent, and not a single one with anyone else. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:59, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:If the point is to determine whether or not there is a preference, then it is incorrect to start with the definitive phrase "these characters have demonstrated a preference." Also, I didn't make a point about Baltar. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:17, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | :If the point is to determine whether or not there is a preference, then it is incorrect to start with the definitive phrase "these characters have demonstrated a preference." Also, I didn't make a point about Baltar. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:17, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::You said "the same-race interactions do not outnumber the interracial ones" in an edit summary, which is true for Baltar, but not Thrace. As for Thrace, I think it's quite safe to say that she's demonstrated a preference. --[[User: | ::You said "the same-race interactions do not outnumber the interracial ones" in an edit summary, which is true for Baltar, but not Thrace. As for Thrace, I think it's quite safe to say that she's demonstrated a preference. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 13:24, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
Who agrees with me that it's coincidental? [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:53, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | Who agrees with me that it's coincidental? [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:53, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:But the word usage "has demonstrated a preference" does offend me. It should be "seems to have demonstrated a preference", in the interest of accuracy. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 18:16, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | :But the word usage "has demonstrated a preference" does offend me. It should be "seems to have demonstrated a preference", in the interest of accuracy. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 18:16, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I don't see why. "Seems to" is a weasel phrase - it weakens the statement without improving the factual validity. --[[User: | ::I don't see why. "Seems to" is a weasel phrase - it weakens the statement without improving the factual validity. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:56, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::It does not weaken the statement and it does improve the factual vailidity. It gives the correct impression that there is only the appearance of a preference and not necessarily the fact. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 20:55, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | :::It does not weaken the statement and it does improve the factual vailidity. It gives the correct impression that there is only the appearance of a preference and not necessarily the fact. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 20:55, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::The statement is that she has demonstrated a preference, which she has plainly done with her choice of sexual partners. We are certainly not claiming that she has made a statement on the matter. --[[User: | ::::The statement is that she has demonstrated a preference, which she has plainly done with her choice of sexual partners. We are certainly not claiming that she has made a statement on the matter. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:52, 21 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::::Having many relationships with Europeans is NOT the same as demonstrating a preference towards Europeans. Either (a) she rejected other candidates because they were not European, in which case there is a preference for Europeans, or (b) she was attracted to all these people based solely on other characteristics and it is coincidental they were all European, in which case there is no preference for Europeans. Thus "has possibly demonstrated a preference" is the Only accurate (and thus strong) way to write the sentence. The sentence as is is weakened by the existence of other possibilities which it does not account for. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 12:14, 21 May 2006 (CDT) | :::::Having many relationships with Europeans is NOT the same as demonstrating a preference towards Europeans. Either (a) she rejected other candidates because they were not European, in which case there is a preference for Europeans, or (b) she was attracted to all these people based solely on other characteristics and it is coincidental they were all European, in which case there is no preference for Europeans. Thus "has possibly demonstrated a preference" is the Only accurate (and thus strong) way to write the sentence. The sentence as is is weakened by the existence of other possibilities which it does not account for. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 12:14, 21 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:On second thought, let's leave out this controversial word "preference" altogether, and just say "That being said, at least one individual, Kara Thrace, has only been shown in romantic or sexual relationships with people of her own race, having been involved with..." which is entirely factual. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 12:18, 21 May 2006 (CDT) | :On second thought, let's leave out this controversial word "preference" altogether, and just say "That being said, at least one individual, Kara Thrace, has only been shown in romantic or sexual relationships with people of her own race, having been involved with..." which is entirely factual. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 12:18, 21 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I think I'm fine with that. --[[User: | ::I think I'm fine with that. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:21, 21 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::Glad it's settled. I don't like arguing. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 14:24, 21 May 2006 (CDT) | :::Glad it's settled. I don't like arguing. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 14:24, 21 May 2006 (CDT) | ||