Editing Talk:Numerology/Archive 1
Discussion page of Numerology/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't ''completely'' off the wall. See above. --[[User:Watcher|Watcher]] 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT) | ::Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't ''completely'' off the wall. See above. --[[User:Watcher|Watcher]] 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT) | ||
:::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad|wrong]]. --[[User: | :::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad|wrong]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT) | ||
::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT) | ::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT) | ||
Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST) | Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST) | ||