Editing Talk:Michael Robert/Archive 1
Discussion page of Michael Robert/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:::::Centurian has actually been used onscreen during Galactica 1980 as well (I'll hold off on the DVD release to post screencaps), so that one can be argued. Yahern, though, is obviously a typo. I don't see why Mike can't also be short for Micah (any name that can be abbreviated often will). If they say, "Micah" (I'm not arguing that they do) AND that's corroborated by the official material, I'd say that the on-screen evidence that is backed up (by both the subtitles and the book) is stronger than a single onscreen prop. Basically, if Micah was a mistake, they did it three times (which seems to go beyond coincidence), whereas Michael only has the written reference and an assumption about the abbreviated form of the name. I don't know how far we want to go to prove that they said Micah vs. Michael though, with regards to audio analysis and sound graphs, etc. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:36, 8 December 2007 (CST) | :::::Centurian has actually been used onscreen during Galactica 1980 as well (I'll hold off on the DVD release to post screencaps), so that one can be argued. Yahern, though, is obviously a typo. I don't see why Mike can't also be short for Micah (any name that can be abbreviated often will). If they say, "Micah" (I'm not arguing that they do) AND that's corroborated by the official material, I'd say that the on-screen evidence that is backed up (by both the subtitles and the book) is stronger than a single onscreen prop. Basically, if Micah was a mistake, they did it three times (which seems to go beyond coincidence), whereas Michael only has the written reference and an assumption about the abbreviated form of the name. I don't know how far we want to go to prove that they said Micah vs. Michael though, with regards to audio analysis and sound graphs, etc. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:36, 8 December 2007 (CST) | ||
::::::I never heard "Micah," I always heard it as "Mike." --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:13, 10 December 2007 (CST) | ::::::I never heard "Micah," I always heard it as "Mike." --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:13, 10 December 2007 (CST) | ||