Editing Talk:Majahual/Archive 1
Discussion page of Majahual/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Viper Construction?== | ==Viper Construction?== | ||
Episode hasn't aired in pacific time yet, but did this ship actually construct 40 vipers? --[[User: | Episode hasn't aired in pacific time yet, but did this ship actually construct 40 vipers? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:36, 3 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:Actually, it's not a ship. It's an asteroid that contains enough metal (and a quote) for the fleet to construct up to 40 Vipers. Also, it's confirmed that a Pegasus construction facility has successfully built a new Viper about 15 minutes into the episode. They have the resources, they just haven't used them yet. I'm updating as the episode airs to pave the way for others. --Ltcrashdown 22:39, 3 February 2006 (EST) | :Actually, it's not a ship. It's an asteroid that contains enough metal (and a quote) for the fleet to construct up to 40 Vipers. Also, it's confirmed that a Pegasus construction facility has successfully built a new Viper about 15 minutes into the episode. They have the resources, they just haven't used them yet. I'm updating as the episode airs to pave the way for others. --Ltcrashdown 22:39, 3 February 2006 (EST) | ||
::I see that [[User:Erik Pflueger]] has added this article to [[The Fleet (RDM)]]. Can somebody who has seen the episode please verify that edit and correct, if necessary? --[[User: | ::I see that [[User:Erik Pflueger]] has added this article to [[The Fleet (RDM)]]. Can somebody who has seen the episode please verify that edit and correct, if necessary? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:11, 3 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:::My fault I guess. I just said that it was a mining operation. It's possible that Majahual was a ship working on the asteroid field, but I'll have to watch the episode again to be sure. --Ltcrashdown 23:13, 3 February 2006 (EST) | :::My fault I guess. I just said that it was a mining operation. It's possible that Majahual was a ship working on the asteroid field, but I'll have to watch the episode again to be sure. --Ltcrashdown 23:13, 3 February 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
How do we know it only took 29 days? Scar was killed on the 29th day, but they could have kept mining longer. In fact, when Roslin said another 9 days I'm pretty sure the scene didn't start with "216 hours ago". --[[User:Undc23|Undc23]] 05:19, 5 February 2006 (EST) | How do we know it only took 29 days? Scar was killed on the 29th day, but they could have kept mining longer. In fact, when Roslin said another 9 days I'm pretty sure the scene didn't start with "216 hours ago". --[[User:Undc23|Undc23]] 05:19, 5 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:Good point. Does anyone know what the time frame was for Roslins' comment? --[[User: | :Good point. Does anyone know what the time frame was for Roslins' comment? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 05:42, 5 February 2006 (EST) | ||
::I checked, it's 81 hours, which is 3 days approx. So the mining took 35 days (29 - 3 + 9), assuming Roslins estimate proved accurate. It'd be fair to say about 35 days, or 5 weeks. --[[User:Undc23|Undc23]] 06:33, 5 February 2006 (EST) | ::I checked, it's 81 hours, which is 3 days approx. So the mining took 35 days (29 - 3 + 9), assuming Roslins estimate proved accurate. It'd be fair to say about 35 days, or 5 weeks. --[[User:Undc23|Undc23]] 06:33, 5 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:::Long time to be sitting around... A good opportunity for a few basestars to jump in and blow everything to hell. Perhaps the fact that Boomer was onboard the Big G had something to do with this event not occuring? -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 10:11, 5 February 2006 (EST) | :::Long time to be sitting around... A good opportunity for a few basestars to jump in and blow everything to hell. Perhaps the fact that Boomer was onboard the Big G had something to do with this event not occuring? -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 10:11, 5 February 2006 (EST) | ||