| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==More Rank Confusion==
| |
| Okay, so clearly Lee is once again a [[Major]]. Is this his second unexplained demotion? Was his rank always Major, and was he just referred to as [[Commander]] due to his position as the commanding officer on [[Pegasus]]? In the US Navy an officer of any rank is referred to as "Captain" when he is in command of a vessel. -- [[User:Doopokko|Doopokko]] 18:03, 1 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| :The demotion appears to be similar to naval protocols where the rank of commander is given only to the captain of a ship. Since Lee hasn't a ship, he goes down to the highest non-ship command rank. This is speculation, but seems to be the only reason. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 19:07, 1 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| :Yeah, there is really no need to explain it. He was a Commander and we saw that promotion (The Captain's Hand). But it doesn't make that much sense to keep as Commander when he's "just" the CAG. Rank isn't everything anyways --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:22, 2 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| ::It's all a bit odd. The best assumption is that Lee's promotion to Commander was a [[Wikipedia:Brevet (military)|brevet]], which ended with his command - this is not an uncommon practice during wartime, when faced with a shortage of officers. Although William Adama's resignation letter in "Hero" (and, according to the podcast, early drafts of the script) feature him leaving Lee in command after his departure, we should remember that Colonel Tigh was still on the outs at that point. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 18:27, 2 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| :::We should remember that the Colonial military has less than 3000 people left. Promotions have always been shown as very fluid, and they don't necessarily use the same standards as before the Fall of the Colonies. People are promoted and demoted as needed to do their jobs and position counts for more than rank. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:37, 2 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| Can someone clarify this for me? When William Adama gets promoted to admiral ("commander of more than one ship is called an admiral"), he gets to keep his position/rank after losing the other ship (which should, theoretically, mean that he's a mere commander again), while this is not true for Lee Adama. How come? This would all make sense if commander was, in fact, a position, not a rank, but it's listed as a rank on this wiki. [[User:Thorn|Thorn]] 02:25, 25 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| :Adama is an experienced officer who was eligible to be promoted to Admiral for awhile but had been passed over. Since he was military commander of the fleet, the President promoted him to a suitable rank, which also helps them if they encounter any more meglomanical Admirals like Caine again. Conversely, Apollo is a young inexperienced officer (only promoted to Captain just before the miniseries.), so there is no reason not to demote him back down to Major after Pegasus was destroyed. He was probably only promoted to keep him above the officers already posted to her. This also keeps him from outranking Colonel Tigh as well. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 05:25, 25 January 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| ::This promotion/demotion business is a flaw of the series we cannot possibly solve.
| |
| ::If Apollo is promoted to a rank of Commander when taking over Pegasus - and just appointed Commander of that ship - his later appearing as Major implies a demotion, which is a disciplinary measure (note that Kendra Shaw's demotion is explained by insubordination). But Apollo's demotion is not explained. And one shouldn't assume that Admiral Adama is not as high-handed as Admiral Cain.
| |
| ::Adama's Admiralship after the destruction of Pegasus is actually not a problem because President Roslin's explanation ("more than one ship") is nonsensical. And Admiral is in charge of a military fleet and after the desctruction of Pegasus the military fleet consists of just one single ship. And sure the promotion is caused by the experience of Cain's command, as before that no one considered promoting Adama.
| |
| ::Back to Apollo: he is not that young and inexperienced. And if demoted back to the next lower rank, why is he not Colonel Adama then? Maybe because all Colonels in the series are supposed to be inept characters.
| |
| ::IMHO, the series switches back and forth between a rank-based structure and one in which commands and posts (be it a battlestar, be it CAG) are given out and taken back at whim. [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 09:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Role == | | == Role == |
|
| |
|
| Should Lee's role be changed? I get the feeling he'll very shortly be CAG of Galactica again, but "currently" he's a Raptor pilot on Pegasus. [[User:Rocky8311|Rocky8311]] 20:14, October 19, 2005 (EDT) | | Should Lee's role be changed? I get the feeling he'll very shortly be CAG of Galactica again, but "currently" he's a Raptor pilot on Pegasus. [[User:Rocky8311|Rocky8311]] 20:14, October 19, 2005 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| :It should be changed when it changes. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 23:35, 19 October 2005 (EDT) | | :It should be changed when it changes. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:35, 19 October 2005 (EDT) |
| | |
| Speaking of roles, what's the best way to sort them? Start with the most recent on top or the first? -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 17:59, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| : Most current, then working on down. It should be a generalized list, since he's been CAG on and off during the series run... and we don't want to load the infobox with the different instances he was a CAG, obviously. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 18:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Cylons== | | ==Cylons== |
| Line 30: |
Line 11: |
| :With Caprica-Sharon in [[Home, Part I]]. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 19:32, 20 October 2005 (EDT) | | :With Caprica-Sharon in [[Home, Part I]]. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 19:32, 20 October 2005 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| :Why? There have only been three Cylons identified within the fleet so far. One [[Litmus|blew himself up]], Starbuck was tasked with interrogating [[Flesh and Bone|another]], and Lee was in the brig during Gal-Boomer's last days. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 18:00, 20 October 2005 (EDT) | | :Why? There have only been three Cylons identified within the fleet so far. One [[Litmus|blew himself up]], Starbuck was tasked with interrogating [[Flesh and Bone|another]], and Lee was in the brig during Gal-Boomer's last days. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:00, 20 October 2005 (EDT) |
| | |
| On the subject of Cylons, has anybody noticed that before the Alliance, Lee seems to harbor strong anti-Cylon sentiments. Stronger than most. That's one of the most undernoticed things about him, methinks.--[[User:Spidersense215|Spidersense215]] 04:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Lee vs Adama== | | ==Lee vs Adama== |
| The article was just modified to change several instances of Adama to Lee. Changing "Lee" to "Adama" done as an effort to be consistent with the principle of using the last name on "home pages" of characters. [[Talk:Ellen Tigh|See Discussion Here]] I don't want to immediately revert that change (as I know exactly how long it takes to make those changes, having done the inverse), but I was wondering if we're going to stick with the last name policy or not. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:47, 13 December 2005 (EST) | | The article was just modified to change several instances of Adama to Lee. Changing "Lee" to "Adama" done as an effort to be consistent with the principle of using the last name on "home pages" of characters. [[Talk:Ellen Tigh|See Discussion Here]] I don't want to immediately revert that change (as I know exactly how long it takes to make those changes, having done the inverse), but I was wondering if we're going to stick with the last name policy or not. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:47, 13 December 2005 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| :I've reverted it. Our policy is clear and well-discussed. Mq59 can take it up on [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Standards and Conventions]] if he has a new point to make. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 16:13, 13 December 2005 (EST) | | :I've reverted it. Our policy is clear and well-discussed. Mq59 can take it up on [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Standards and Conventions]] if he has a new point to make. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:13, 13 December 2005 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| == Source for "Floating in Water" Cylon Comparison? == | | == Source for "Floating in Water" Cylon Comparison? == |
| Line 51: |
Line 30: |
| :My take on this: There is typically one Captain in any pilot group--that person's also the CAG. When Stinger was assigned CAG for all pilots, Adama might have been demoted by default, but I can't find any record of that happening directly (insignia checker take note). When Thrace was promoted to Captain, she became CAG as well. While pilots can be Captains when not assigned to a group (as Adama was before he arrived on ''Galactica''), being actively assigned to a battlestar may also change things. Another likely point was that Cain demoted him as punishment in addition to revoking his flight status until Thrace asked for him back. Educational guesses--maybe someone can read through the transcripts? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 18:35, 19 January 2006 (EST) | | :My take on this: There is typically one Captain in any pilot group--that person's also the CAG. When Stinger was assigned CAG for all pilots, Adama might have been demoted by default, but I can't find any record of that happening directly (insignia checker take note). When Thrace was promoted to Captain, she became CAG as well. While pilots can be Captains when not assigned to a group (as Adama was before he arrived on ''Galactica''), being actively assigned to a battlestar may also change things. Another likely point was that Cain demoted him as punishment in addition to revoking his flight status until Thrace asked for him back. Educational guesses--maybe someone can read through the transcripts? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 18:35, 19 January 2006 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| ::Bill Adama refers to him as Lieutenant in Resurrection Ship, Part II. No idea when the actual demotion took place, or if [[Cole Taylor]] and [[George Birch]] remained captains after losing their CAG position. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 20:17, 19 January 2006 (EST) | | ::Bill Adama refers to him as Lieutenant in Resurrection Ship, Part II. No idea when the actual demotion took place, or if [[Cole Taylor]] and [[George Birch]] remained captains after losing their CAG position. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:17, 19 January 2006 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| :::I made the edit about his Lieutenant status. I assumed that it was a result of Cain's punishment rather than being assigned to Pegasus, as Stinger still refers to him as Captain in the teaser of Res Ship II. Also, getting a demotion due to reassignment sounds really wierd (though possible, I guess). --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 20:35, 19 January 2006 (EST) | | :::I made the edit about his Lieutenant status. I assumed that it was a result of Cain's punishment rather than being assigned to Pegasus, as Stinger still refers to him as Captain in the teaser of Res Ship II. Also, getting a demotion due to reassignment sounds really wierd (though possible, I guess). --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 20:35, 19 January 2006 (EST) |
| Line 57: |
Line 36: |
| ::::I think that Birch got a temporary promotion to captain, to be CAG, but that others like Taylor and Lee were captains through normal promotion through ranks (i.e. not dependent on being CAG or not) thus I think/hope that Apollo will be promoted right back to Captain by next week's episode, as I see NO reason why his father wouldn't just promote him back to Captain. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]][[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 22:06, 19 January 2006 (EST) | | ::::I think that Birch got a temporary promotion to captain, to be CAG, but that others like Taylor and Lee were captains through normal promotion through ranks (i.e. not dependent on being CAG or not) thus I think/hope that Apollo will be promoted right back to Captain by next week's episode, as I see NO reason why his father wouldn't just promote him back to Captain. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]][[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 22:06, 19 January 2006 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| :::::At the risk of digressing, the kid did not exactly look... spaceworthy, at the end of last episode. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 22:39, 19 January 2006 (EST) | | :::::At the risk of digressing, the kid did not exactly look... spaceworthy, at the end of last episode. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:39, 19 January 2006 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| ::::::I'll digress right with you. Lee's expression matched the stunned, open-mouthed expression of the character, Cameron, from "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", after Cameron "kills" his dad's Porsche. Lee's worse off than Kat was when she was drugged out on stims. He's clinically depressed. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 00:22, 20 January 2006 (EST) | | ::::::I'll digress right with you. Lee's expression matched the stunned, open-mouthed expression of the character, Cameron, from "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", after Cameron "kills" his dad's Porsche. Lee's worse off than Kat was when she was drugged out on stims. He's clinically depressed. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 00:22, 20 January 2006 (EST) |
| Line 71: |
Line 50: |
| :Aircraft carriers are usually commanded by aviators; the same is true of Battlestars. Both Admiral Adama and Colonel Tigh are former aviators, as were, as far as we can tell from the insignia, Cain and Fisk. Furthermore, Tigh doesn't want a command. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 19:52, 18 February 2006 (EST) | | :Aircraft carriers are usually commanded by aviators; the same is true of Battlestars. Both Admiral Adama and Colonel Tigh are former aviators, as were, as far as we can tell from the insignia, Cain and Fisk. Furthermore, Tigh doesn't want a command. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 19:52, 18 February 2006 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| ::Just to clarify, a friend of mine (ex-USN) has told me that a Carrier may ONLY be commanded by an aviator, and since Ron Moore has described Galactica as an aircraft carrier in space (and given all the other references to current-day military), it's safe to assume that this Command structure is the same in BSG-land. Also: Garner knew more about tactics than Lee did? No offence, but did you even watch [[The Captain's Hand]]? Had Garner any real knowledge of command tactics, it's doubtful that the [[Battle of the Binary Star System]] would have unfolded as it did. With regards to his promotion to Major- it seems to be the general concensus (although never explicitly stated on screen) that Lee was assigned to Pegasus as Garner's XO. If this is the case (which i don't believe- see bottom of page), the Old Man may have promoted him to Major in order to give him more clout over the other Pegasus officers --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 07:43, 12 September 2006 (CDT) | | ::Just to clarify, a friend of mine (ex-USN) has told me that a Carrier may ONLY be commanded by an aviator. Also: Garner knew more about tactics than Lee did? No offence, but did you even watch [[The Captain's Hand]]? Had Garner any real knowledge of command tactics, it's doubtful that the [[Battle of the Binary Star System]] would have unfolded as it did. With regards to his promotion to Major- it seems to be the general concensus (although never explicitly stated on screen) that Lee was assigned to Pegasus as Garner's XO. If this is the case (which i don't believe- see bottom of page), the Old Man may have promoted him to Major in order to give him more clout over the other Pegasus officers --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 07:43, 12 September 2006 (CDT) |
|
| |
|
| : Why [[Lee Adama]]? Believe it or not, given what we know of the surviving military personnel, Lee is now one of the senior officers of the fleet. [[Saul Tigh|Tigh]] is utterly unsuitable for command, has no "cred" on ''Pegasus'', and would do nothing to improve their morale. Furthermore, there's no evidence that Tigh '''wants''' a command of his own, ever. Lee, for all his faults (and brother, does he have faults) has shown quick thinking, and an ability to make even questionable decisions work out in nondisasterous ways. He'll either grow up really, really fast, or he won't, in which case I expect that ''Pegasus's'' deckhands will be installing a revolving door on the commander's cabin.--[[User:UncleMikey|Uncle Mikey]] 14:25, 24 February 2006 (EST) | | : Why [[Lee Adama]]? Believe it or not, given what we know of the surviving military personnel, Lee is now one of the senior officers of the fleet. [[Saul Tigh|Tigh]] is utterly unsuitable for command, has no "cred" on ''Pegasus'', and would do nothing to improve their morale. Furthermore, there's no evidence that Tigh '''wants''' a command of his own, ever. Lee, for all his faults (and brother, does he have faults) has shown quick thinking, and an ability to make even questionable decisions work out in nondisasterous ways. He'll either grow up really, really fast, or he won't, in which case I expect that ''Pegasus's'' deckhands will be installing a revolving door on the commander's cabin.--[[User:UncleMikey|Uncle Mikey]] 14:25, 24 February 2006 (EST) |
| Line 99: |
Line 78: |
|
| |
|
| Just like to point out that theres a behind the scenes thing for Season 3 up on scifi.com's video player, in which theres a scene involving fat lee during an episode, and also explains the chunkicity. HTH :) --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 20:22, 18 August 2006 (CDT) | | Just like to point out that theres a behind the scenes thing for Season 3 up on scifi.com's video player, in which theres a scene involving fat lee during an episode, and also explains the chunkicity. HTH :) --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 20:22, 18 August 2006 (CDT) |
|
| |
| == Lee as Pegasus XO? ==
| |
|
| |
| I move that this section of the article be revised or deleted entirely. It was never explicitly stated on screen that the reason for Lee's transfer to Pegasus was to become Garner's XO; all we are told was that he was to keep an eye on Starbuck, and that it was temporary- "I should be back again in a couple of weeks". Garner also sates, rather aggressively, that he is "not a member of this crew" to the CIC Sergeant of the Guard. Surely that is reason enough to conclude that he was in fact NOT Garner's XO? --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 07:55, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| :Anyone have a different view on this? Have I mised something? --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 07:20, 20 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::In one of the [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/video/deleted/season2.html deleted scenes] (217.1 Dinner Conversation) Tigh asks "You still thinking about making Apollo his XO?". That could mean that Adm. Adama wanted to send over Apollo just to help Garner for now (as per your dialogue citations), but thought about making him the permanent XO --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:15, 20 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :::Aren't we taking what is on screen as what is canon, though? --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 11:12, 20 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::::I can't tell you how much I hate the fraking C-word and its overuse! I've seen other articles argue with deleted scenes too, or adding information from them to character bios. Sometimes they are even necessary to fully understand some developments, like why Socinus went to Kobol. Personally, unless they are contradicted later, I don't see why they shouldn't be at least considered in speculation. When the writers wrote the episode they had ideas about why Lee went to the Pegasus and in what capacity. This scene is also an expression of that ideas even if it wasn't shown on TV. Besides, it's not like I'm contradicting you. It's supporting what you said above. He wasn 't the XO ''yet'' --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:29, 20 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :::::Oh, I know you're not contradicting me. And I've just read the BW:OC in which the very kind [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] points out that the writing room operates as if "every scene shot happened". So, I suppose, I'll stand back. I had never seen that deleted scene before :( (undoubtadely cause I'm from the UK, and because I didn't even ''know'' there was a deleted scene) --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 12:50, 20 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Article formatting. ==
| |
|
| |
| The Lee Adama article is formatted differently than all the other character articles. Here we have actual paragraphs describing the character, whereas elsewhere we merely have note points. I'm sort of a stickler for consistency and was wondering if there are plans to reformat this page. This would be a massive undertaking and, frankly, I like the formatting of the Lee page much better. We may thus want to reformat the other pages (but that would be an even larger endeavor). I just wanted to see if anyone else was thinking about this, or what the general consensus to such a project may be...-- Helo87
| |
| :The paragraph format is the standard, but some of the character articles grew so large under that format that they had to be condensed to remain at a reasonable size (without splitting it up into subarticles). If you look at the bulleted characters histories, you ought to be able to find the (gigantic) older formatting versions. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:38, 14 February 2008 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| :If anything, the other articles should be changed to highlight pivotal character moments instead of just retelling all plot points. I think this is somewhat if a model for what character articles should be. Not so much because of bullet points vs paragraphs, but because it actually focuses on Lee Adama as a character and analyzes his motivations and habits a bit. As such, using paragraphs is really advantageous.
| |
| :Overall a prefer paragraphs, but bullet points also have their uses. With paragraphs, it's hard to find good transitions, so when dealing with lots of varied information, bullet points have their uses. But as said, they can become too long and hard to read. There was actually a whole bio project about this, but while we agreed that a more character focused approach would be great, it didn't really take off. You'll notice that the large, bulleted articles are often a bit plot focused. An exception to this is the last section of [[William Adama]], which I rewrote a bit, because it overlaps so much with this one and is really suitable for a character focused approach. Rewriting entire articles of this length is also a lot of work though.
| |
| :[[Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Character Bio Project|Here]] is the link to the bio project, which also contains a lengthier comment by me about this very article and why I rewrote it somewhat (content, not format). The proposal itself also notes the idea of a mixed format, but that wasn't so popular I think. We should probably tackle this again after the show's end, if it's not done by then, and not much new content is added. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:47, 14 February 2008 (CST)
| |
| ::Yeah Serenity, that sounds like a plan. I think that the eventual goal (once the series is over) would be to condense the character pages because they end up being a complete recap of the series from each individuals point of view. This is pretty stupid, and I think that it detracts from the overall purpose of the character pages; to provide information on who someone was and what the defining moments of their lives were. Then again, that is the general problem with creating a good Wiki (though I think that everyone's doing a great job here), in that there is a lot of information overlapping between articles. For example, when I redid the "Fall of the Twelve Colonies" page there was a section that described the nature of the humanoid Cylons, and frankly, that was unnecessary. In the end I just erased it all and made sure there were appropriate links to the page that was meant to explain that (i.e. the humanoid Cylon page). -- Helo87
| |
|
| |
| == Family tree ==
| |
|
| |
| Would "Gianne" and her unborn child fit into the family tree, despite the fact that Gianne and Lee's baby was never born? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :Gianne and Lee were engaged but didn't marry, and we don't know if the baby was even far along enough to be legally considered alive. It has no known name to put on the tree. So I don't think so. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Boxes ==
| |
|
| |
| I don't want to start a fight over anything, since I know we've been over what should/shouldn't be in the succession boxes before, but if we're going to include Lee and Zarek's stints as Acting President, then shouldn't we also include his post as Acting XO on ''Pegasus'', as well as Kat's stint as acting CAG (in the Pegasus trilogy) and Birch's as actual, designated CAG (in Home I & II)? Thus, either the minimalist version:
| |
|
| |
| {{start box}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Jackson Spencer|Jackson "Ripper" Spencer]]|title=[[Commander Air Group|Commander, Air Group]], ''[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]''|after=[[Kara Thrace|Kara "Starbuck" Thrace]]}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Barry Garner]]|title=Commanding Officer, ''[[Pegasus (RDM)|Pegasus]]''|after=''(none, ship destroyed)''}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Louanne Katraine|Louanne "Kat" Katraine]]|title=[[Commander Air Group|Commander, Air Group]], ''[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]''|after=[[Karl Agathon|Karl "Helo" Agathon]]}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Cowen]]|title=Caprican delegate to the [[Quorum of Twelve (RDM)|Quorum of Twelve]]|after=''Incumbent''}}
| |
| {{end box}}
| |
|
| |
| or the completist version:
| |
|
| |
| {{start box}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Jackson Spencer|Jackson "Ripper" Spencer]]|title=[[Commander Air Group|Commander, Air Group]], ''[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]''|after=[[George Birch|George "Catman" Birch]]}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[George Birch|George "Catman" Birch]]|title=[[Commander Air Group|Commander, Air Group]], ''[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]''|after=[[Louanne Katraine|Louanne "Kat" Katraine]] (Acting)}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Louanne Katraine|Louanne "Kat" Katraine]] (Acting)|title=[[Commander Air Group|Commander, Air Group]], ''[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]''|after=[[Kara Thrace|Kara "Starbuck" Thrace]]}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=''(unknown, eventually [[Jack Fisk]])|title=Executive Officer, ''[[Pegasus (RDM)|Pegasus]]'' (Acting)|after=''(unknown, eventually [[Anastasia Dualla]])''}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Barry Garner]]|title=Commanding Officer, ''[[Pegasus (RDM)|Pegasus]]''|after=''(none, ship destroyed)''}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Louanne Katraine|Louanne "Kat" Katraine]]|title=[[Commander Air Group|Commander, Air Group]], ''[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]''|after=[[Karl Agathon|Karl "Helo" Agathon]]}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Cowen]]|title=Caprican delegate to the [[Quorum of Twelve (RDM)|Quorum of Twelve]]|after=''(unknown)''}}
| |
| {{succession box|before=[[Tom Zarek]] (Acting)|title=President of the [[The Twelve Colonies of Kobol|Twelve Colonies of Kobol]] (Acting)|after=''Incumbent''}}
| |
| {{end box}}
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 01:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :I think in general it's more important to note that he held very different positions than documenting the CAG switcheroos just because he went on some mission and needed to be replaced for one episode. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Surely then, his position as acting President due to Roslin's temporary absence is equally unimportant? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 17:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::I wouldn't think so, given that he's responsible for the alliance with the Cylons. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 17:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Move request==
| |
|
| |
| I requested that this article should be moved back to [[Lee Adama]].
| |
| *It is proper to note (verified) full forms of names in articles, but the article should be under that character's most common name. (And there is nothing in [[/BW:SAC#Characters_Names_and_TitlesSAC]] that requires the recent move so it shouldn't be called "conventionalising" (This was done in the Talk page to the Cally article - the whole move wasn't discussed here, as far as I can tell.)
| |
| *The character is consistently referred to as either Lee, Captain/Lieutenant/Major/Commander Adama or Apollo.
| |
| *I have never heard of one occurence of Leland (but I am only in the middle of the third series watching). Even though, such a lone occurence would not justify the article title given the principle laid out above.
| |
|
| |
| [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 09:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :I agree with the above. In the entire series, I remember only one instance of the use "Leland". Also, I think it's common for articles to be named after the better known name of a person. For instance, on wikipedia, there are articles titled "Stonewall Jackson" instead of "Thomas Jackson" and "Jimmy Carter" instead of "James Carter". I don't see why we should do anything different based on a very limited use of Lee's full first name. [[User:CylonCAG|CylonCAG]] 02:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :I could go either way, but I'd lean toward "Leland" for consistency's sake: It's nice having all the character articles in the same format, and using "Lee" would invite "Helo Agathon", "Dee Dualla" and "Jammer Lyman" - all as reasonable as "Lee Adama", since they are practically never called by their real first names, but ''really silly looking''. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 03:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::I see what you mean, but I don't think those cases are the same as Lee. To my knowledge none of those characters have ever been called "Helo Agathon" or any of the other names. However, Lee has been called "Lee Adama" many, many times. For instance, Lee once screams "My name is Lee Adama...". If say, Helo had once said "I'm Helo Agathon" or if Dee had been addressed as "Dee Dualla" that would be different. However, names like that are combining two different names, while Lee Adama is the actual name Lee is called by for the vast majority of the series. [[User:CylonCAG|CylonCAG]] 04:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :::"for consistency's sake: It's nice having all the character articles in the same format, and using "Lee" would invite ..."
| |
| :::And for consistency's sake I am in favour of Lee Adama, Cally Henderson/Tyrol, Karl Agathon etc. Consistency which takes the series itself into account.
| |
| :::Examples like "Helo Agathon", "Dee Dualla" and "Jammer Lyman" are nonsensical as these people are never called this way. Helo is either called "Helo", "Karl Agathon", "Karl C. Agathon", "Lt./Captain Agathon" etc. Call signs are alternative to the real names, not cominations with them. And we rightfully opt to use the real names, since this clearly distinguishes the new Apollo, new Starbuck, new Boomer, new Athena from their very different TOS counterparts.
| |
| :::"since they are practically never called by their real first names"
| |
| :::Not true, not true. Helo is called Karl by Sharon, Apollo is almos consistently called Lee by Starbuck (and Starbuck Kara by Apollo).
| |
| :::[[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 09:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Agree. [[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|talk]]) 13:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::This and [[Talk:Callandra Tyrol]] seem to be a bit of a tempest in a teacup to me. If you type "Lee Adama" into the search box, you get to the right place. Ditto for "Cally". I think the articles should use the full given name if it's revealed in the series. Should we move [[William Adama]] to Bill Adama? After all, he's hardly ever called William. I think not. The beauty of redirects is in that we can redirect any permutation of the name. Going through the hassle of moving these articles, correcting links, etc., is probably not the best use of our time with a huge influx of new users, multiple episode summaries that need concision/cleanup. Your mileage may vary. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 13:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::My worry is that we may start including the names "Leland Adama" and "Callandra Tyrol" in other articles. After all, if I replaced the use of "Lee Adama" with "Leland Adama" every time "Lee" was used (minus direct quotes), I wouldn't be doing anything wrong. However, this would be confusing. True, if I clicked on Leland I'd be directed here, but it still would be a bit confusing to read that Leland is the CAG, especially considering the name Leland was used just once. [[User:CylonCAG|CylonCAG]] 17:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::::Obviously we shouldn't use "Leland" in article text when the colloquial "Lee" is more appropriate, but isn't the title of the article a separate issue? I think what most people would do is type "Lee Adama" into the search box, end up here, think "Huh, Lee is short for Leland" and then think nothing of it again. It's nice to be able to provide fuller and more accurate information, and I think that the current practice does so in an unobtrusive way. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 20:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::::: That makes sense. But what I am worried about is if someone changes Lee to the still correct but less used Leland. Let's say I went through the wiki and changed almost every instance of Lee to "Leland". Would it stay that way, be reverted, or have an edit war between the use of "Lee" and "Leland"? It probably wouldn't be the end of the worldif Leland were used instead of Lee, but it would definitly be a bit weird. [[User:CylonCAG|CylonCAG]] 22:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Knocking this down to first level, hence the lack of indentation. First, we refer to characters by their proper names when it comes to '''naming the article''', so "Leland Adama" should remain that way. Again, we have redirects in place that make this point moot, so it's clearly not for usability reasons.
| |
|
| |
| The second, and probably the most important actual issue here, is how the names are used in the article. For clarity's sake, we should '''always use the character's first name or last name when referring to that character'''. Properly, last names are preferred over first names, since last names are more formal and proper for the encyclopedia/reference guide that we've constructed. Callsigns should be totally avoided at all costs, since these are informal military names. (The '''only''' reason we should ''ever'' refer to a character by their callsign is because we don't know of the character by any other name.) When it comes to first names, which is the real issue up for discussion here, I do agree that Lee should always be used if needed, the same with Cally. "Bill" is really a unique case that likely merits further discussion, since he's been referred to as both in the series. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 03:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Thank you for making that clear. As long as we do that, I'm fine calling this article Leland. [[User:CylonCAG|CylonCAG]] 04:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==BCE==
| |
|
| |
| Please, take note of [[Talk:Timeline_(RDM)#BCE_occurences|this issue]]. [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 09:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
