Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Editing Talk:Language in the Twelve Colonies/Archive1

Discussion page of Language in the Twelve Colonies/Archive1
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 7: Line 7:
== Racetrack ==
== Racetrack ==


Is it just me or does Racetrack have a vaguely Canadian accent in her scene on the Raptor early in [[Final Cut]]? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 02:10, 10 September 2005 (EDT)
Is it just me or does Racetrack have a vaguely Canadian accent in her scene on the Raptor early in [[Final Cut]]? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:10, 10 September 2005 (EDT)


== Stating the obvious ==
== Stating the obvious ==
Line 13: Line 13:
:''Mister (Mr), Miss, and Doctor have all been used, but Missus {Mrs} has not.''
:''Mister (Mr), Miss, and Doctor have all been used, but Missus {Mrs} has not.''


The concision fairy frowns in disapproval. Why is this interesting? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 02:26, 17 September 2005 (EDT)
The concision fairy frowns in disapproval. Why is this interesting? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:26, 17 September 2005 (EDT)


Nothing much since we haven't seen anyone married. Given the gender equality in BSG, however, it may well be that "Mrs" is not used. --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 17:20, 17 September 2005 (EDT)
Nothing much since we haven't seen anyone married. Given the gender equality in BSG, however, it may well be that "Mrs" is not used. --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 17:20, 17 September 2005 (EDT)
Line 25: Line 25:
:As for Wikipedia, they referred to this accent as [[Wikipedia:Standard Midwestern|Standard Midwestern]] until last February. It was then [[Wikipedia:Talk:General American#move to "General American"?|moved]] to [[Wikipedia:General American|General American]] based on [[Wikipedia:User:Angr|User:Angr]]'s statement that "the accent is not standard in any official sense, nor is it limited to the Midwest."
:As for Wikipedia, they referred to this accent as [[Wikipedia:Standard Midwestern|Standard Midwestern]] until last February. It was then [[Wikipedia:Talk:General American#move to "General American"?|moved]] to [[Wikipedia:General American|General American]] based on [[Wikipedia:User:Angr|User:Angr]]'s statement that "the accent is not standard in any official sense, nor is it limited to the Midwest."


:Since they are serving as our primary reference, I am inclined to follow their conventions on the matter. Perhaps you could take up your point with them? I realize that we are not powerless to employ our own terminology, but consistency strikes me as a self-evident virtue. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 02:31, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
:Since they are serving as our primary reference, I am inclined to follow their conventions on the matter. Perhaps you could take up your point with them? I realize that we are not powerless to employ our own terminology, but consistency strikes me as a self-evident virtue. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:31, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


:: Sigh. General American bothers me. I'd ''much'' prefer Standard American English. I mean--that's a term that linguists use when discussing American accents. I wish Wikipedia had a page entitled that, but I don't want to get into a land war there (or, really anything there as time is finite). A few things have to be understood about SAE (or, as it stands, General English):
:: Sigh. General American bothers me. I'd ''much'' prefer Standard American English. I mean--that's a term that linguists use when discussing American accents. I wish Wikipedia had a page entitled that, but I don't want to get into a land war there (or, really anything there as time is finite). A few things have to be understood about SAE (or, as it stands, General English):
Line 35: Line 35:
:: With these two things in mind, using a term like SAE to refer to dialects of characters is perfectly fine. I mean--the dialect is a kind of mental construct and so doesn't really exist and the characters, likewise, don't really exist. ;) OK. That was a joke. My problem with the term "General American" is that I've never seen it before in a linguistic context. "Standard American English" is a term used in all caps like that in many texts by various authors. I'm tired and I think I'm losing coherency. Does my point about, for lack of a better word, officialness come across clearly? I sure hope so. --[[User:Day|Day]] 03:04, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
:: With these two things in mind, using a term like SAE to refer to dialects of characters is perfectly fine. I mean--the dialect is a kind of mental construct and so doesn't really exist and the characters, likewise, don't really exist. ;) OK. That was a joke. My problem with the term "General American" is that I've never seen it before in a linguistic context. "Standard American English" is a term used in all caps like that in many texts by various authors. I'm tired and I think I'm losing coherency. Does my point about, for lack of a better word, officialness come across clearly? I sure hope so. --[[User:Day|Day]] 03:04, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


:::I would be happy to have the relevant links marked as Standard American English and go to Wiki's General American article through pipes. The term General American was introduced on October 8th by [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] - I'd like to know if he is personally in favor of the term, or was just matching wikipedia's terminology. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 03:09, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
:::I would be happy to have the relevant links marked as Standard American English and go to Wiki's General American article through pipes. The term General American was introduced on October 8th by [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] - I'd like to know if he is personally in favor of the term, or was just matching wikipedia's terminology. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 03:09, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


== Valley Girl Accent ==
== Valley Girl Accent ==
Line 43: Line 43:
"And, like, the lords anointed a leader to like, guide the Caravan of the Heavens to their new homeland?, and, like, unto the leader they gave a vision of serpents numbering two and ten?, as like, a sign of things to come?, which is like, totally spooky. And then, like, the Arrow of Apollo will open the Tomb of Athena, which is totally ''boss'', but Zeus like, got all uppity and warned the leaders of the twelve tribes that any return to Kobol would exact a price in blood, which is totally ''gross'', 'cause blood is gross, y'know? And like, a real ''bummer'', since Kobol is hot shit."
"And, like, the lords anointed a leader to like, guide the Caravan of the Heavens to their new homeland?, and, like, unto the leader they gave a vision of serpents numbering two and ten?, as like, a sign of things to come?, which is like, totally spooky. And then, like, the Arrow of Apollo will open the Tomb of Athena, which is totally ''boss'', but Zeus like, got all uppity and warned the leaders of the twelve tribes that any return to Kobol would exact a price in blood, which is totally ''gross'', 'cause blood is gross, y'know? And like, a real ''bummer'', since Kobol is hot shit."


So say we all. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 20:19, 17 September 2005 (EDT)
So say we all. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:19, 17 September 2005 (EDT)


: NO, that was meant to sound religious, in the tone of "And the number shall be "three".  "Four" be too many, and "two" be too few (unless though then proceedeth to "three").  "Five" is right out.  ---Ricimer, 17 Sept, 2005
: NO, that was meant to sound religious, in the tone of "And the number shall be "three".  "Four" be too many, and "two" be too few (unless though then proceedeth to "three").  "Five" is right out.  ---Ricimer, 17 Sept, 2005


::The effect is, as noted, somewhat different when you read them all out in a list. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 20:39, 17 September 2005 (EDT)
::The effect is, as noted, somewhat different when you read them all out in a list. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:39, 17 September 2005 (EDT)


:::Damn both of you. My deykoard is ruimed from spittake effect with kola! [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 18:03, 23 September 2005 (EDT)
:::Damn both of you. My deykoard is ruimed from spittake effect with kola! [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 18:03, 23 September 2005 (EDT)
Line 56: Line 56:


*Link to credible text repository & audio recording.
*Link to credible text repository & audio recording.
*Transliterate Sanskrit properly, using IAST. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 00:53, 14 November 2005 (EST)
*Transliterate Sanskrit properly, using IAST. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:53, 14 November 2005 (EST)


Hopefully the Don Davis sources may be of help to others in further translation from his Matrix Revolutions tracks (noted in our article now). Enlightening stuff--I use the "Navras" track and its chant in my daily workouts--gets my heart rate up. I was wondering why Elosha's chant seemed so damned familiar, and now I know why. Wild how my favorite SF topics and music merge like this. Speaking of which, I think a music article on BSG will be due sometime... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:09, 14 November 2005 (EST)
Hopefully the Don Davis sources may be of help to others in further translation from his Matrix Revolutions tracks (noted in our article now). Enlightening stuff--I use the "Navras" track and its chant in my daily workouts--gets my heart rate up. I was wondering why Elosha's chant seemed so damned familiar, and now I know why. Wild how my favorite SF topics and music merge like this. Speaking of which, I think a music article on BSG will be due sometime... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:09, 14 November 2005 (EST)


:Am I the only one who finds this matrix stuff to be badly off-topic? Davis's transliteration isn't very good, either. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 14:04, 14 November 2005 (EST)
:Am I the only one who finds this matrix stuff to be badly off-topic? Davis's transliteration isn't very good, either. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:04, 14 November 2005 (EST)


::I'm going to strike this. If anyone wants to make a note of the coincidence on the references page, that would be fine. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 21:12, 14 November 2005 (EST)
::I'm going to strike this. If anyone wants to make a note of the coincidence on the references page, that would be fine. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:12, 14 November 2005 (EST)


== Other Accents ==
== Other Accents ==
Line 70: Line 70:
::Many Canadian accents are very similar to the Midwestern SAE used in Hollywood. If you can name a character with a particularly strong accent, I'd be happy to identify them here, but Hogan, Douglas, Helfer and Penikett don't seem to fit the bill.
::Many Canadian accents are very similar to the Midwestern SAE used in Hollywood. If you can name a character with a particularly strong accent, I'd be happy to identify them here, but Hogan, Douglas, Helfer and Penikett don't seem to fit the bill.


::Note that place of origin and accent do not necessarily coincide - nobody would claim that Lee Adama speaks with a British Accent, although Jamie Bamber certainly does. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 20:32, 17 January 2006 (EST)
::Note that place of origin and accent do not necessarily coincide - nobody would claim that Lee Adama speaks with a British Accent, although Jamie Bamber certainly does. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:32, 17 January 2006 (EST)


:::I've always felt that Hogan's accent is somewhat obvious, but again, I'm not much experienced with Canadian-accented English.  (I only know two or three Canadians myself.)  Besides, you make a good point: even if Hogan's accent ''is'' strong enough to be considered noticable, it is no where near as different from SAE as, say, Baltar's. [[User:Drumstick|Drumstick]] 21:35, 17 January 2006 (EST)
:::I've always felt that Hogan's accent is somewhat obvious, but again, I'm not much experienced with Canadian-accented English.  (I only know two or three Canadians myself.)  Besides, you make a good point: even if Hogan's accent ''is'' strong enough to be considered noticable, it is no where near as different from SAE as, say, Baltar's. [[User:Drumstick|Drumstick]] 21:35, 17 January 2006 (EST)
Line 83: Line 83:
== Texas Accent ==
== Texas Accent ==


Y'know, Baltar's Six definitely refers to his "nucular device" in "[[Epiphanies]]". --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 14:49, 21 January 2006 (EST)
Y'know, Baltar's Six definitely refers to his "nucular device" in "[[Epiphanies]]". --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:49, 21 January 2006 (EST)


: Actually, that's not a Texas thing. We talked about that specifically in one of my classes, since that's such a common misconception due to G. W. Bush's hailing from our state and and pronouncing it thus. Apparently that's common in many Southern dialects (as in "The South" which includes states as far north as Virginia, but not, say, New Mexico). Not that Texas is really ''excluded'' from that list, I just thought I'd point out that it's more common than many city-dwellers think (including myself before I attended the afore mentioned lecture). Personally, I say it "NEW-clee-er" only slightly more often than "NEW-cue-ler". I feel like I"m rambling on, so I won't go into what factors contribute to a dialect switching the L and the following vowel in this word. --[[User:Day|Day]] 23:57, 21 January 2006 (EST)
: Actually, that's not a Texas thing. We talked about that specifically in one of my classes, since that's such a common misconception due to G. W. Bush's hailing from our state and and pronouncing it thus. Apparently that's common in many Southern dialects (as in "The South" which includes states as far north as Virginia, but not, say, New Mexico). Not that Texas is really ''excluded'' from that list, I just thought I'd point out that it's more common than many city-dwellers think (including myself before I attended the afore mentioned lecture). Personally, I say it "NEW-clee-er" only slightly more often than "NEW-cue-ler". I feel like I"m rambling on, so I won't go into what factors contribute to a dialect switching the L and the following vowel in this word. --[[User:Day|Day]] 23:57, 21 January 2006 (EST)
Line 97: Line 97:
== Names ==
== Names ==


I don't think its worthwhile to discuss the "meaning" of names that were borrowed from TOS here. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 23:17, 15 March 2006 (CST)
I don't think its worthwhile to discuss the "meaning" of names that were borrowed from TOS here. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:17, 15 March 2006 (CST)
:Not sure that's entirely true (obviously :-) ), since in several cases Larson clearly borrowed those names from Hebrew/Greek himself, deliberately, and RDM is following in his footsteps.--[[User:UncleMikey|Uncle Mikey]] 23:20, 15 March 2006 (CST)
:Not sure that's entirely true (obviously :-) ), since in several cases Larson clearly borrowed those names from Hebrew/Greek himself, deliberately, and RDM is following in his footsteps.--[[User:UncleMikey|Uncle Mikey]] 23:20, 15 March 2006 (CST)
::I think we need to edit down "Names" a lot for relevance/concision. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 23:58, 15 March 2006 (CST)
::I think we need to edit down "Names" a lot for relevance/concision. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 23:58, 15 March 2006 (CST)
Line 126: Line 126:
:::::I don't think they're any more mistakes then talking of dogs horses and such. There's no reason why languages other than english can exist within the Colonies. Might even be a second language to them since they're teaching it to preschoolers--[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 17:05 June 06 2006
:::::I don't think they're any more mistakes then talking of dogs horses and such. There's no reason why languages other than english can exist within the Colonies. Might even be a second language to them since they're teaching it to preschoolers--[[User:Sauron18|Sauron18]] 17:05 June 06 2006


:Very nice find, Sauron. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 20:39, 6 June 2006 (CDT)
:Very nice find, Sauron. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:39, 6 June 2006 (CDT)


== Clean-Up ==
== Clean-Up ==
Line 142: Line 142:
:::Well if you feel it was okay, yeah, add it back.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 16:40, 19 July 2006 (CDT)
:::Well if you feel it was okay, yeah, add it back.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 16:40, 19 July 2006 (CDT)


::::My two cents: I find practically none of this speculation interesting or insightful. The Matrix comparison is a bad one, since I don't find that line of inquiry interesting, either. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 14:47, 20 July 2006 (CDT)
::::My two cents: I find practically none of this speculation interesting or insightful. The Matrix comparison is a bad one, since I don't find that line of inquiry interesting, either. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:47, 20 July 2006 (CDT)


Well, that's two to one against, so let's just leave it shall we? It was only an observation after all; if people really find such speculation useless to the point of being offensive, then it's hardly worth my time to carry on with something that's clearly creating hostility. - Tawakalna
Well, that's two to one against, so let's just leave it shall we? It was only an observation after all; if people really find such speculation useless to the point of being offensive, then it's hardly worth my time to carry on with something that's clearly creating hostility. - Tawakalna
Line 164: Line 164:
:''(It is probably some subtle nuance that a Colonial character like Baltar could notice, but that is indistinguishable from an American accent to the audience).''
:''(It is probably some subtle nuance that a Colonial character like Baltar could notice, but that is indistinguishable from an American accent to the audience).''


No, listen. None of these characters are actually speaking English. The whole thing is a conceit to make it intelligible to the viewer. I'm sure that in the fictional universe of BSG, Boomer does speak with a "trace of an Aerelon accent", but since the show chooses to represent this as Standard American English, there's little point speculating about phonological variations that we can't hear. It's not a matter of Baltar being able to hear something we can't, the showmakers have just chosen not to give us the information. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 01:38, 10 September 2005 (EDT)
No, listen. None of these characters are actually speaking English. The whole thing is a conceit to make it intelligible to the viewer. I'm sure that in the fictional universe of BSG, Boomer does speak with a "trace of an Aerelon accent", but since the show chooses to represent this as Standard American English, there's little point speculating about phonological variations that we can't hear. It's not a matter of Baltar being able to hear something we can't, the showmakers have just chosen not to give us the information. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:38, 10 September 2005 (EDT)


: Yeah. I tend to agree. My agreement is influenced by a couple of things in addition to the above.
: Yeah. I tend to agree. My agreement is influenced by a couple of things in addition to the above.
Line 178: Line 178:
: This is getting absurdly lengthy. I apologize. I tend to do this when words are at issue. Anyway, one final point: I don't think the same thing can be necessarily said for "race". Since where your genes are from, geographically, is a rather more visual thing, I tend to think that this would more easily occur to a TV producer as something worth keeping track of. That doesn't mean that it did and they are, but that most of my arguments here don't apply to that case much. I'll, ah, I'm done now. ;o) --[[User:Day|Day]] 03:31, 10 September 2005 (EDT)
: This is getting absurdly lengthy. I apologize. I tend to do this when words are at issue. Anyway, one final point: I don't think the same thing can be necessarily said for "race". Since where your genes are from, geographically, is a rather more visual thing, I tend to think that this would more easily occur to a TV producer as something worth keeping track of. That doesn't mean that it did and they are, but that most of my arguments here don't apply to that case much. I'll, ah, I'm done now. ;o) --[[User:Day|Day]] 03:31, 10 September 2005 (EDT)


::Well said. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 04:01, 10 September 2005 (EDT)
::Well said. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 04:01, 10 September 2005 (EDT)


It is true that Grace Park is a fluent speaker of Korean, but her English--either as Sharon Valerii or as herself in interviews--bears no trace of a Korean accent whatsoever.  I am married to a native Korean speaker, have friends and colleagues who speak Korean either as their first or second language, and have been studying the language for a few years myself, so I am absolutely certain that Korean has no bearing on what might or might not be considered an Aerelon accent. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]]
It is true that Grace Park is a fluent speaker of Korean, but her English--either as Sharon Valerii or as herself in interviews--bears no trace of a Korean accent whatsoever.  I am married to a native Korean speaker, have friends and colleagues who speak Korean either as their first or second language, and have been studying the language for a few years myself, so I am absolutely certain that Korean has no bearing on what might or might not be considered an Aerelon accent. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]]


:I tend to agree, but felt like someone would bring up her bilingualism inevitably and that it would be better to address it directly. If Grace Park (and thus Boomer) has a trace of ''any'' accent, it ought to be Korean, so I felt it worth a mention. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 02:31, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
:I tend to agree, but felt like someone would bring up her bilingualism inevitably and that it would be better to address it directly. If Grace Park (and thus Boomer) has a trace of ''any'' accent, it ought to be Korean, so I felt it worth a mention. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:31, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


::You said that Grace Park's bilingualism would come up eventually.  I would recommend limiting discussions of her bilingualism to the actress' bio page.  The label "Korean" doesn't meaningfully describe anything that's going on when Sharon/Boomer is speaking.  My own Korean is getting good enough that I'm approaching true "bilingual" status, but nobody would use "Korean" to describe my English. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]]
::You said that Grace Park's bilingualism would come up eventually.  I would recommend limiting discussions of her bilingualism to the actress' bio page.  The label "Korean" doesn't meaningfully describe anything that's going on when Sharon/Boomer is speaking.  My own Korean is getting good enough that I'm approaching true "bilingual" status, but nobody would use "Korean" to describe my English. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]]
Line 188: Line 188:
:::Discussing Park's bilingualism on the actress' bio page would not shed any insight for a reader of this page, nor would it allay any questions that such knowledge might raise. I understand that her spoken English is flawless, but the fact that it is not actually her first language is at least marginally relevant here, and is given the footnote it deserves.
:::Discussing Park's bilingualism on the actress' bio page would not shed any insight for a reader of this page, nor would it allay any questions that such knowledge might raise. I understand that her spoken English is flawless, but the fact that it is not actually her first language is at least marginally relevant here, and is given the footnote it deserves.


:::As for her "northwestern" accent, I don't truly believe that that's any different from General American/Standard Midwestern - the only phonological difference I can think of is the caught/cot merger, which is too subtle to deserve the name "accent". --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 03:00, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
:::As for her "northwestern" accent, I don't truly believe that that's any different from General American/Standard Midwestern - the only phonological difference I can think of is the caught/cot merger, which is too subtle to deserve the name "accent". --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 03:00, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


:::: Perhaps it should be specifically noted here that her Korean fluency doesn't seem to have any impact whatsoever on her English accent. I agree with Peter that it's important to note it here, so that someone who doesn't know any better doesn't come along and think we missed that point and that they've solved our problem by mentioning a (non-existent) Korean accent. Sometimes, when you are making an argument or assertion, you have to mention some things that are, really, irrelevant in order to make clear that they are, indeed, irrelevant so that others will not wrongly think that they are. Make sense? --[[User:Day|Day]] 03:08, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
:::: Perhaps it should be specifically noted here that her Korean fluency doesn't seem to have any impact whatsoever on her English accent. I agree with Peter that it's important to note it here, so that someone who doesn't know any better doesn't come along and think we missed that point and that they've solved our problem by mentioning a (non-existent) Korean accent. Sometimes, when you are making an argument or assertion, you have to mention some things that are, really, irrelevant in order to make clear that they are, indeed, irrelevant so that others will not wrongly think that they are. Make sense? --[[User:Day|Day]] 03:08, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
Line 194: Line 194:
::::I was just about to say something like that.  Thanks, Day! --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 03:10, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
::::I was just about to say something like that.  Thanks, Day! --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 03:10, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


:::::Tried to make it a little more forceful. You can tell that this wiki is great because we spend whole evenings discussing single sentences. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 03:18, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
:::::Tried to make it a little more forceful. You can tell that this wiki is great because we spend whole evenings discussing single sentences. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 03:18, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


:::::: Nice edit. And I hope you were being serious. I spent a lot of time in college working on a print publication and for the last couple years, I was the Editor in Chief (kind of a joke because there were only six of us on staff). In any case, it was a humor publication and sometimes we'd spend hours debating about the wording of a single sentence in order to deliver the most punch. It almost always paid off. In this case, we're not looking to be funny, but I still think it pays to make sure a sentence communicates exactly the information we intend: no more and no less. --[[User:Day|Day]] 17:48, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
:::::: Nice edit. And I hope you were being serious. I spent a lot of time in college working on a print publication and for the last couple years, I was the Editor in Chief (kind of a joke because there were only six of us on staff). In any case, it was a humor publication and sometimes we'd spend hours debating about the wording of a single sentence in order to deliver the most punch. It almost always paid off. In this case, we're not looking to be funny, but I still think it pays to make sure a sentence communicates exactly the information we intend: no more and no less. --[[User:Day|Day]] 17:48, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


::::::: Quite serious. Concision is nothing without precision. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 23:48, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
::::::: Quite serious. Concision is nothing without precision. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:48, 19 October 2005 (EDT)


:::::::: So, you're not really the Concision Fairy. You're the Concision/Precision Fairy. Which is less concise, but more precise. Maybe you're the (Con|Pre)cision Fairy. Phleh. --[[User:Day|Day]] 16:16, 20 October 2005 (EDT)
:::::::: So, you're not really the Concision Fairy. You're the Concision/Precision Fairy. Which is less concise, but more precise. Maybe you're the (Con|Pre)cision Fairy. Phleh. --[[User:Day|Day]] 16:16, 20 October 2005 (EDT)
Line 220: Line 220:
We can't fanwank the use of English, but we should note the likelihood that the colonists came from Kobol with, or over time developed a common language between them. I just think this article is too out-of-universe and so makes little sense in its current form. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:52, 13 December 2007 (CST)
We can't fanwank the use of English, but we should note the likelihood that the colonists came from Kobol with, or over time developed a common language between them. I just think this article is too out-of-universe and so makes little sense in its current form. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:52, 13 December 2007 (CST)


:I feel like I'm starting to sound like a broken record here, but I really don't get the objections to this "out of universe" perspective. My ''purpose'' in writing the original version of this article was to put together a cogent, out-of-universe, critical analysis of language in the ''series'', not language in the ''show's universe''. Has everyone decided against the utility of such articles now? And if so, why? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 12:53, 13 December 2007 (CST)
:I feel like I'm starting to sound like a broken record here, but I really don't get the objections to this "out of universe" perspective. My ''purpose'' in writing the original version of this article was to put together a cogent, out-of-universe, critical analysis of language in the ''series'', not language in the ''show's universe''. Has everyone decided against the utility of such articles now? And if so, why? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:53, 13 December 2007 (CST)


::I don't see anything wrong with that either. This is an article that almost demands it. If you remove those parts, there is nothing left. We could write a few lines about the in-universe languages, but it wouldn't be much. What could be done is separate the two areas better. First do the out-of-universe stuff and then some in-universe info. For example putting the Aerelon accent under the real-life English accents might not be such a good idea, even though it naturally contains out-of-universe information. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:12, 13 December 2007 (CST)
::I don't see anything wrong with that either. This is an article that almost demands it. If you remove those parts, there is nothing left. We could write a few lines about the in-universe languages, but it wouldn't be much. What could be done is separate the two areas better. First do the out-of-universe stuff and then some in-universe info. For example putting the Aerelon accent under the real-life English accents might not be such a good idea, even though it naturally contains out-of-universe information. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:12, 13 December 2007 (CST)


:::I probably didn't make myself clear. For articles such as these, the order of the information is just as important as the cinematic analysis. In other words, note the specific languages/dialects used or said by the characters. Next, the rest. As an encyclopedia, the emphasis should be on the in-show content first (if any...the [[Computers in the Re-imagined Series]] article would look like crap if we applied that since there's no technobabble). If result unbalances the article as read, I can understand that, and it might be better to leave it closer to its format. Right now, my eyes dance around it. The subject matter is fine. The ''order'' of it, not so much. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 17:17, 13 December 2007 (CST)
:::I probably didn't make myself clear. For articles such as these, the order of the information is just as important as the cinematic analysis. In other words, note the specific languages/dialects used or said by the characters. Next, the rest. As an encyclopedia, the emphasis should be on the in-show content first (if any...the [[Computers in the Re-imagined Series]] article would look like crap if we applied that since there's no technobabble). If result unbalances the article as read, I can understand that, and it might be better to leave it closer to its format. Right now, my eyes dance around it. The subject matter is fine. The ''order'' of it, not so much. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 17:17, 13 December 2007 (CST)

To edit this page, please enter the words that appear below in the box (more info):

Refresh
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

  [] · [[]] · [[|]] · {{}} · · “” ‘’ «» ‹› „“ ‚‘ · ~ | ° &nbsp; · ± × ÷ ² ³ ½ · §
     [[Category:]] · [[:File:]] · [[Special:MyLanguage/]] · <code></code> · <nowiki></nowiki> <code><nowiki></nowiki></code> · <syntaxhighlight></syntaxhighlight> · <includeonly></includeonly> · <noinclude></noinclude> · #REDIRECT[[]] · <translate></translate> · <languages/> · {{#translation:}} · <tvar|></> · {{DEFAULTSORT:}} · <categorytree></categorytree> · <div style="clear:both;"></div> <s></s>


Your changes will be visible immediately.
  • For testing, please use the sandbox instead.
  • On talk pages, please sign your comment by typing four tildes (~~~~).