Editing Talk:Home, Part II/Archive 1
Discussion page of Home, Part II/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:::::Could you try being politer? This is a genuine debate and you are not the end-all be-all of Galactica lines. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:42, 5 October 2006 (CDT) | :::::Could you try being politer? This is a genuine debate and you are not the end-all be-all of Galactica lines. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:42, 5 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::No, you're right. I'm not, infact I made a mistake (supposedly) about the ...erm... "boomer" said what??? debate over at the websode talk page. I swear he says "Laura told me" (jxh487) | ::::::No, you're right. I'm not, infact I made a mistake (supposedly) about the ...erm... "boomer" said what??? debate over at the websode talk page. I swear he says "Laura told me" (jxh487) | ||
:::FWIW, the phoneme /k/ is realized as voiceless, un-aspirated [k] in word-final position, as is the phoneme /g/ in word-initial position. Thus, it would be trivial to confuse "fuck" and "for g-" - the only phonetic difference is in the vowel. --[[User: | :::FWIW, the phoneme /k/ is realized as voiceless, un-aspirated [k] in word-final position, as is the phoneme /g/ in word-initial position. Thus, it would be trivial to confuse "fuck" and "for g-" - the only phonetic difference is in the vowel. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:25, 5 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
== Using a Compass? == | == Using a Compass? == | ||