Editing Talk:Hand mine/Archive 1
Discussion page of Hand mine/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Basically, we should have a general category [[:Category:Technology]], with sub categories to [[:Category:Technology (RDM)]] and [[:Category:Technology (TOS)]]? Or just tag pages with both the general technology cat and then the specific technology series cat? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 14:35, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | :::Basically, we should have a general category [[:Category:Technology]], with sub categories to [[:Category:Technology (RDM)]] and [[:Category:Technology (TOS)]]? Or just tag pages with both the general technology cat and then the specific technology series cat? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 14:35, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::(Kosh voice) Yes. (To both.) The series specific Technology categories would be subcats of technology, but unfortunately (well, kind of) the parent category doesn't list the contents of child categories in its main area (I could see that getting messy quickly, though). So you'd have to tag the page with both tech and tech (TOS) to get it to show up on both. The principle of single inheritance would only apply to categories, not articles, so articles could get tagged with whatever categories (and subcategories) that it makes sense for them to be part of. We should probably re-kickstart the category discussion to solicit more opinions, but that's my interpretation of the scheme that Farago layed out. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:06, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | ::::(Kosh voice) Yes. (To both.) The series specific Technology categories would be subcats of technology, but unfortunately (well, kind of) the parent category doesn't list the contents of child categories in its main area (I could see that getting messy quickly, though). So you'd have to tag the page with both tech and tech (TOS) to get it to show up on both. The principle of single inheritance would only apply to categories, not articles, so articles could get tagged with whatever categories (and subcategories) that it makes sense for them to be part of. We should probably re-kickstart the category discussion to solicit more opinions, but that's my interpretation of the scheme that Farago layed out. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:06, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | ||