Editing Talk:Galactica 1980/Archive 1
Discussion page of Galactica 1980/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
::Of course there is still the qwustion of what else is considered main continuity and not (comics for example), but I know such items are typically not part of continuity. --[[User:RedKnight|RedKnight]] 19:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ::Of course there is still the qwustion of what else is considered main continuity and not (comics for example), but I know such items are typically not part of continuity. --[[User:RedKnight|RedKnight]] 19:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Actually, you might not be aware of this, but the common consensus on a majority of the TOS fandom in question is to ignore ''1980'' entirely. There is also Glen Larson's continued insistence on the subject—notably his crack about ''1980'' being Starbuck's bad dream—that dictates this otherwise odd separation. Further, comics are generally considered [[BW:SEPCON|separate continuity]] sources, and therefore not canon. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | :::Actually, you might not be aware of this, but the common consensus on a majority of the TOS fandom in question is to ignore ''1980'' entirely. There is also Glen Larson's continued insistence on the subject—notably his crack about ''1980'' being Starbuck's bad dream—that dictates this otherwise odd separation. Further, comics are generally considered [[BW:SEPCON|separate continuity]] sources, and therefore not canon. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Well, that does make sense although simply " | ::::Well, that does make sense although simply "no liking" something does not make it stop existing. Jumping into Star Trek for comparison, the age-old debate about the animated series being canon or not within TOS has begun to sway towards its inclusion believe it or not. Similarly, just about anything Star Wars is "supposed" to be canon, yet since Lucas does not like the infamous Holiday Special it is not canon, yet many fans argue with this decision regardless of his views. | ||
::::Comics and novels... I would automatically consider any non-canon excepts where expressly stated such as the Buffy the Vampire Slayer comics. Difficult choices overall and many open to individual interpretation I guess. --[[User:RedKnight|Watcher of the Omniverse]] 23:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ::::Comics and novels... I would automatically consider any non-canon excepts where expressly stated such as the Buffy the Vampire Slayer comics. Difficult choices overall and many open to individual interpretation I guess. --[[User:RedKnight|Watcher of the Omniverse]] 23:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ||