Editing Talk:Gaius Baltar/Archive 1
Discussion page of Gaius Baltar/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==A Friendly Wager, Spencerian== | ==A Friendly Wager, Spencerian== | ||
Spencerian, you are adamant that the evidence points towards Baltar being a Cylon. I, however, firmly believe that the many facts, points of evidence, and conjecture, etc. already posted up in counterarguements on this article makes it '''impossible''' for Baltar to be a Cylon. (Note that it isn't simply "my gut feeling"; I believe that, logically, the evidence points against it). -->Our edits on BattlestarWiki, in the Question and Analysis sections in the episode guide, and in checking and comparing various points and theories on the other articles (involving Cylons, timeline, etc, etc.) are based on such debate over the facts.-->'''I believe that this debate forms a macrocosm of this in its most concentrated form, a logical edit debate, based on facts and points of evidence (rather than flame war and childish name calling). '''In short, I view it as the ultimate test, of our skills, our ability to make good conjecture based on evidence at hand, comparing points and counterpoints'''.--->As a result Spencerian | Spencerian, you are adamant that the evidence points towards Baltar being a Cylon. I, however, firmly believe that the many facts, points of evidence, and conjecture, etc. already posted up in counterarguements on this article makes it '''impossible''' for Baltar to be a Cylon. (Note that it isn't simply "my gut feeling"; I believe that, logically, the evidence points against it). -->Our edits on BattlestarWiki, in the Question and Analysis sections in the episode guide, and in checking and comparing various points and theories on the other articles (involving Cylons, timeline, etc, etc.) are based on such debate over the facts.-->'''I believe that this debate forms a macrocosm of this in its most concentrated form, a logical edit debate, based on facts and points of evidence (rather than flame war and childish name calling). '''In short, I view it as the ultimate test, of our skills, our ability to make good conjecture based on evidence at hand, comparing points and counterpoints'''.--->As a result Spencerian, because we hold these polar opposite views on this matter, I propose the following gentlemanly wager; [u]If Baltar is proved to or revealed to be a Cylon, your edits will hold precedence over anything I write '''in perpetuity'''. If Baltar is proven beyond any resonable doubt to be a Human and ''not'' a Cylon, ''my'' edits will hold precendence over anything you write '''in perpetuity'''.[/u] | ||
:For example, conditions under which Ricimer wins this wager are: | :For example, conditions under which Ricimer wins this wager are: | ||
*The remaining six humanoid Cylon models are eventually revealed, and we see that NONE of the 12 models are Gaius Baltar. | *The remaining six humanoid Cylon models are eventually revealed, and we see that NONE of the 12 models are Gaius Baltar. | ||