Editing Talk:Faster-than-light communication/Archive 1
Discussion page of Faster-than-light communication/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Basestar communication | * Basestar communication | ||
** Use Raiders as go-betweens. Every basestar has 800 Raiders, so they can spare a few. | ** Use Raiders as go-betweens. Every basestar has 800 Raiders, so they can spare a few. | ||
:I still don't get the Tylium ship tracking. The fleet is trying to travel several thousand light-years to the Ionian nebula. None of their jumps will be just 12 light-hours, each jump will be a maximum range jump for the fleet, in a direction the Cylons don't in theory know. I can only see two ways to follow them. One is that the Cylons, in spite of everything we've been led to think, can tell where a ship jumped to by careful examination of the outgoing jump. The other is that they are getting information back from the target after it jumps. Of course there is a third -- somebody in the fleet is telling them the new coordinates, like in 33. Which doesn't explain them showing up at the old location 6 hours later. I didn't include another instance of FTL communication I suspect is taking place, as it's much more speculative. The Cylon god and/or the other powers manipulating events do seem to be communicating at will with both the colonials and the Cylons and their hybrids. But we have not yet been shown final info on the reality of the Cylon God and the inner Six, so that remains more a speculation. | :I still don't get the Tylium ship tracking. The fleet is trying to travel several thousand light-years to the Ionian nebula. None of their jumps will be just 12 light-hours, each jump will be a maximum range jump for the fleet, in a direction the Cylons don't in theory know. I can only see two ways to follow them. One is that the Cylons, in spite of everything we've been led to think, can tell where a ship jumped to by careful examination of the outgoing jump. The other is that they are getting information back from the target after it jumps. Of course there is a third -- somebody in the fleet is telling them the new coordinates, like in 33. Which doesn't explain them showing up at the old location 6 hours later. I didn't include another instance of FTL communication I suspect is taking place, as it's much more speculative. The Cylon god and/or the other powers manipulating events do seem to be communicating at will with both the colonials and the Cylons and their hybrids. But we have not yet been shown final info on the reality of the Cylon God and the inner Six, so that remains more a speculation. | ||
I suggest this article be revised to say "''possible'' FTL communication", since there is a plausible alternative in each case. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 10:27, 21 March 2007 (CDT) | I suggest this article be revised to say "''possible'' FTL communication", since there is a plausible alternative in each case. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 10:27, 21 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
| Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
:::::Don't feel like this is a personal attack, Bradtem, and I'm sorry if it seemed so. As an administrator, I take a more direct need in ensuring that all contributors (including myself) keep to the encyclopedic needs of the wiki, so speculation articles are given extra scrutiny by their nature. I do appreciate your efforts, even if I don't agree with them. It's contributions like yours that go through crucibles of discussion and debate and, often, come out as a valued article. Catrope and others are throwing in their two cents, too, and there is no rush to hastily remove this article as it has significant merit as a continuity issue at the least. We should wait for Bradley Thompson's comments and then we can reopen the issue with a greater light. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:15, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | :::::Don't feel like this is a personal attack, Bradtem, and I'm sorry if it seemed so. As an administrator, I take a more direct need in ensuring that all contributors (including myself) keep to the encyclopedic needs of the wiki, so speculation articles are given extra scrutiny by their nature. I do appreciate your efforts, even if I don't agree with them. It's contributions like yours that go through crucibles of discussion and debate and, often, come out as a valued article. Catrope and others are throwing in their two cents, too, and there is no rush to hastily remove this article as it has significant merit as a continuity issue at the least. We should wait for Bradley Thompson's comments and then we can reopen the issue with a greater light. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:15, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | ||