Editing Talk:Daru Mozu/Archive 1
Discussion page of Daru Mozu/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Has it been clearly established that this is the only refinery ship in the fleet? If so, it should be merged with [[Refinery ship]]. --[[User: | Has it been clearly established that this is the only refinery ship in the fleet? If so, it should be merged with [[Refinery ship]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:34, 21 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:It has not as of yet. We can merge the two anyway, since the info is the same. --[[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 01:37, 21 January 2006 (EST) | :It has not as of yet. We can merge the two anyway, since the info is the same. --[[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 01:37, 21 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::If there's more than one ship, we should keep them separate. I definitely heard Apollo refer to it as "''a'' tylium refinery", not "''the'' tylium refinery" (which doesn't settle it, but isn't good evidence for there being only one), so we should probably hold off on a merge. --[[User: | ::If there's more than one ship, we should keep them separate. I definitely heard Apollo refer to it as "''a'' tylium refinery", not "''the'' tylium refinery" (which doesn't settle it, but isn't good evidence for there being only one), so we should probably hold off on a merge. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:22, 21 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:::There is also the scene in the brig where Roslin mentions "our tylium refinery", as opposed to "one of our tylium refineries." Again, kind of vague but it could indicate that it's the only one. [[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 12:27, 25 January 2006 (EST) | :::There is also the scene in the brig where Roslin mentions "our tylium refinery", as opposed to "one of our tylium refineries." Again, kind of vague but it could indicate that it's the only one. [[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 12:27, 25 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::True. However, let's just say they ''do'' note it in dialogue for a future episode, which is what prompted this in the first place. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 14:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ::True. However, let's just say they ''do'' note it in dialogue for a future episode, which is what prompted this in the first place. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 14:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Not to mention the fact that Tyrol calls the ship the ''Hitei Kan'' in a deleted scene. It's the second deleted scene on the Season 3 R1 discs. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 21:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ::Not to mention the fact that Tyrol calls the ship the ''Hitei Kan'' in a deleted scene. It's the second deleted scene on the Season 3 R1 discs. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 21:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ||