Editing Talk:Daru Mozu/Archive 1
Discussion page of Daru Mozu/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Has it been clearly established that this is the only refinery ship in the fleet? If so, it should be merged with [[Refinery ship]]. --[[User: | Has it been clearly established that this is the only refinery ship in the fleet? If so, it should be merged with [[Refinery ship]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:34, 21 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:It has not as of yet. We can merge the two anyway, since the info is the same. --[[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 01:37, 21 January 2006 (EST) | :It has not as of yet. We can merge the two anyway, since the info is the same. --[[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 01:37, 21 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::If there's more than one ship, we should keep them separate. I definitely heard Apollo refer to it as "''a'' tylium refinery", not "''the'' tylium refinery" (which doesn't settle it, but isn't good evidence for there being only one), so we should probably hold off on a merge. --[[User: | ::If there's more than one ship, we should keep them separate. I definitely heard Apollo refer to it as "''a'' tylium refinery", not "''the'' tylium refinery" (which doesn't settle it, but isn't good evidence for there being only one), so we should probably hold off on a merge. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:22, 21 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:::There is also the scene in the brig where Roslin mentions "our tylium refinery", as opposed to "one of our tylium refineries." Again, kind of vague but it could indicate that it's the only one. [[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 12:27, 25 January 2006 (EST) | :::There is also the scene in the brig where Roslin mentions "our tylium refinery", as opposed to "one of our tylium refineries." Again, kind of vague but it could indicate that it's the only one. [[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 12:27, 25 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I already brought this up on [[Refinery ship]] but got no response so far. Maybe it was lost in the many edits. Does anyone agree, that "Dirty Hands" more or less confirms that there is only one refinery ship? They say "the refinery" and if there were others, the strike probably wouldn't be such a big issue. Combined with the other singular references in the series, I'd like to to combine the article and redirect "refinery ship" to here. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:15, 26 February 2007 (CST) | I already brought this up on [[Refinery ship]] but got no response so far. Maybe it was lost in the many edits. Does anyone agree, that "Dirty Hands" more or less confirms that there is only one refinery ship? They say "the refinery" and if there were others, the strike probably wouldn't be such a big issue. Combined with the other singular references in the series, I'd like to to combine the article and redirect "refinery ship" to here. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:15, 26 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:Barring a retcon by the writers, I believe a merge and redirect is in order. It's clearly apparent to me that there's only one tylium refinery, and that's the ''Daru Mozu''. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 15:31, 26 February 2007 (CST) | :Barring a retcon by the writers, I believe a merge and redirect is in order. It's clearly apparent to me that there's only one tylium refinery, and that's the ''Daru Mozu''. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 15:31, 26 February 2007 (CST) | ||