Editing Talk:Cylons (TOS)/rewrite
Discussion page of Cylons (TOS)/rewrite
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: If you can find a way to do it the way you want it to be done, that'd be fine. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] 10:02, 14 February 2006 (EST) | : If you can find a way to do it the way you want it to be done, that'd be fine. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] 10:02, 14 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:I thought IL just stood for Imperious Leader? --[[User: | :I thought IL just stood for Imperious Leader? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:55, 14 February 2006 (EST) | ||
::That's the common assumption. | ::That's the common assumption. | ||
::"The phrase is a play on words for John Dykstra's Industrial Light and Magic, which provided special effects for Galactica's initial episodes."(http://www.kobol.com/archives/BG-FAQ.html here) (http://www.geocities. | ::"The phrase is a play on words for John Dykstra's Industrial Light and Magic, which provided special effects for Galactica's initial episodes."(http://www.kobol.com/archives/BG-FAQ.html here) (http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/newpage12.html#il or here) | ||
::Like I said, not canonical, but definitely a different twist. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:06, 14 February 2006 (EST) | ::Like I said, not canonical, but definitely a different twist. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:06, 14 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:::Also [[Original Series References#Industrial Light & Magic|here]], but not cited either. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:28, 14 February 2006 (EST) | :::Also [[Original Series References#Industrial Light & Magic|here]], but not cited either. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:28, 14 February 2006 (EST) | ||
I've gone with the separate article concept for the Cylon models. I'm trying to trim the descriptions/bullets on this main page to be about 1 line, and move all the details down into the child articles. I'll try to get some screenshots of the "Civilian" Cylons on Gamoray, after which I'll create an article for them. (There's not much to say about them.) What else needs to go on this page? There's no mention of the attack on the Hasari. I guess that (as a catalyst for the thousand yahren war) may be what little history exists (aside from the Iblis revelations). Cylon Religion appears to be a non-factor in TOS. The Cylon Models are covered. Cylon spacecraft could be highlighted, although there is only the raider and the basestar. I've got a screenshot of a Viper's readout on an old raider that would be perfect for a TOS raider article (whenever that happens). Cylon Tactics would probably be a short article for TOS. The only other thing I can think of might be a mentioning of the concept of the [http://www.geocities. | I've gone with the separate article concept for the Cylon models. I'm trying to trim the descriptions/bullets on this main page to be about 1 line, and move all the details down into the child articles. I'll try to get some screenshots of the "Civilian" Cylons on Gamoray, after which I'll create an article for them. (There's not much to say about them.) What else needs to go on this page? There's no mention of the attack on the Hasari. I guess that (as a catalyst for the thousand yahren war) may be what little history exists (aside from the Iblis revelations). Cylon Religion appears to be a non-factor in TOS. The Cylon Models are covered. Cylon spacecraft could be highlighted, although there is only the raider and the basestar. I've got a screenshot of a Viper's readout on an old raider that would be perfect for a TOS raider article (whenever that happens). Cylon Tactics would probably be a short article for TOS. The only other thing I can think of might be a mentioning of the concept of the [http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/glosef.html Edict of Extermination], but since that was never explicitly discussed during the series (an indirect reference is made in Saga of a Star Wolrd), it may be something best left to speculation. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:29, 14 February 2006 (EST) | ||