Editing Talk:Cylon Religion/Archive 1
Discussion page of Cylon Religion/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This should probably be merged with content from [[God | This should probably be merged with content from [[God]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:26, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:I concur and will likely begin such at some point today if it's not done before I come back to it. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 14:28, 30 December 2005 (EST) | :I concur and will likely begin such at some point today if it's not done before I come back to it. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 14:28, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I know that "Cylons view the worship of multiple gods as blasphemeous against their God." is true. I believe it is specifically attested in [[33]], but I wanted to be sure before claiming such. Can anyone verify that or any other particular source? --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 14:27, 30 December 2005 (EST) | I know that "Cylons view the worship of multiple gods as blasphemeous against their God." is true. I believe it is specifically attested in [[33]], but I wanted to be sure before claiming such. Can anyone verify that or any other particular source? --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 14:27, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:[http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/episodes/season01/112/mov/bsg_del_112_regret.mov Deleted scene], Kobol's Last Gleaming, Part I. --[[User: | :[http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/episodes/season01/112/mov/bsg_del_112_regret.mov Deleted scene], Kobol's Last Gleaming, Part I. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:34, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:Also noted as "false gods" by Sharon Valerii in [[Home, Part I]]. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:39, 30 December 2005 (EST) | :Also noted as "false gods" by Sharon Valerii in [[Home, Part I]]. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:39, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::Part II, FWIW. --[[User: | ::Part II, FWIW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:05, 31 December 2005 (EST) | ||
==Quote Collecting== | ==Quote Collecting== | ||
At present, I think the best thing to do here to ensure an accurate and well-cited entry is to scan episode transcripts for relevant comments and group them by topic and source, similar to the way we did [[Sacred Scrolls]]. --[[User: | At present, I think the best thing to do here to ensure an accurate and well-cited entry is to scan episode transcripts for relevant comments and group them by topic and source, similar to the way we did [[Sacred Scrolls]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:47, 30 December 2005 (EST) | ||
===Natasi=== | ===Natasi=== | ||
| Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
*If the Cylons have access to more historical documents than the Colonials, they must have received them from a third party. Who? | *If the Cylons have access to more historical documents than the Colonials, they must have received them from a third party. Who? | ||
--[[User: | --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:03, 1 January 2006 (EST) | ||
: Perhaps they wrote their own? --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 22:00, 1 January 2006 (EST) | : Perhaps they wrote their own? --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 22:00, 1 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::I do not believe that at any time during "Home, Part II" we ever heard the Cylons say that they "have access to a broader set of documents and scripture than the Colonials". --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 23:50, 1 January 2006 (EST) | ::I do not believe that at any time during "Home, Part II" we ever heard the Cylons say that they "have access to a broader set of documents and scripture than the Colonials". --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 23:50, 1 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:::Boomer: "I'm putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures." --[[User: | :::Boomer: "I'm putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures." --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:29, 2 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::::It's also possible that she was simply referring to historical evidence available to the Colonials but ignored by the more religious of them (a situation similar to many fundamentalists of today). --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 10:53, 2 January 2006 (EST) | ::::It's also possible that she was simply referring to historical evidence available to the Colonials but ignored by the more religious of them (a situation similar to many fundamentalists of today). --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 10:53, 2 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:::::Fair point. --[[User: | :::::Fair point. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:46, 2 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::Further, they do not "have a somewhat opaque ontology"; just because someone didn't understand what he was saying doesn't make it "opaque"; what Leoben was saying were in fact Gnostic and/or vaguely Buddhist ideas, etc. And remember, the Cylons believe that "God is love". --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 23:50, 1 January 2006 (EST) | ::Further, they do not "have a somewhat opaque ontology"; just because someone didn't understand what he was saying doesn't make it "opaque"; what Leoben was saying were in fact Gnostic and/or vaguely Buddhist ideas, etc. And remember, the Cylons believe that "God is love". --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 23:50, 1 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:::If you can explain Leoben's stream-imagery to me in terms of Gnostic and/or Buddhist ideas, I would be delighted. I find them impenetrable. --[[User: | :::If you can explain Leoben's stream-imagery to me in terms of Gnostic and/or Buddhist ideas, I would be delighted. I find them impenetrable. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:31, 2 January 2006 (EST) | ||
== Why couldn't they just mass-produce? == | == Why couldn't they just mass-produce? == | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
The Merovingian removed this passage: "One observer can easily compare the religious conflict between the Colonials and the Cylons to the rise and spread of Christianity and Judaism in Europe during the final days of the [[Wikipedia: Roman Empire | Roman Empire]] and the dethronement of the religious beliefs the Greeks and the Romans believed in." because he felt it was a bit too POV. I don't agree, though it could certainly use cleaning-up grammatically speaking. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 20:13, 10 April 2006 (EST) | The Merovingian removed this passage: "One observer can easily compare the religious conflict between the Colonials and the Cylons to the rise and spread of Christianity and Judaism in Europe during the final days of the [[Wikipedia: Roman Empire | Roman Empire]] and the dethronement of the religious beliefs the Greeks and the Romans believed in." because he felt it was a bit too POV. I don't agree, though it could certainly use cleaning-up grammatically speaking. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 20:13, 10 April 2006 (EST) | ||
:In my opinion, it's not that it's POV; it's just a very poor analogy. --[[User: | :In my opinion, it's not that it's POV; it's just a very poor analogy. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:36, 10 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I think it should be removed, because it is a POV poor analogy. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 21:14, 10 April 2006 (CDT) | ::I think it should be removed, because it is a POV poor analogy. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 21:14, 10 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 240: | Line 240: | ||
==Different religous viewpoints per model?== | ==Different religous viewpoints per model?== | ||
Ok we know the Cavil models are atheist. We know Sixes are particularly devout. Three's seem to question their faith. Leoben makes comments like we are all god (gnosticism?). I think Boomer implied Simon (or was it Doral) couldn't bear to speak God's name. I think none of the models actually agree on what their god is. Cavil's are cynical, Simon's are empirical, Sixes are zealots, Leoben's are into mysticism or some such, Three's seemed to be in spiritual turmoil. --[[User:Meteor|Meteor]] 25 January 2007. | Ok we know the Cavil models are atheist. We know Sixes are particularly devout. Three's seem to question their faith. Leoben makes comments like we are all god (gnosticism?). I think Boomer implied Simon (or was it Doral) couldn't bear to speak God's name. I think none of the models actually agree on what their god is. Cavil's are cynical, Simon's are empirical, Sixes are zealots, Leoben's are into mysticism or some such, Three's seemed to be in spiritual turmoil. --[[User:Meteor|Meteor]] 25 January 2007. | ||