Editing Talk:Chronos/Archive 1
Discussion page of Chronos/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::In looking at the picture, it appears more likely that it is a ''Valkyrie'' type, since it only has one landing bay per pod. I didn't see a second bay underneath, a la ''Pegasus''. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:50, 12 November 2007 (CST) | :::In looking at the picture, it appears more likely that it is a ''Valkyrie'' type, since it only has one landing bay per pod. I didn't see a second bay underneath, a la ''Pegasus''. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:50, 12 November 2007 (CST) | ||
::::The artwork is really poor to make a good determination. I looked at the rear engine pod configuration to get an idea. We could simply just call it a "battlestar" and leave the class out of it. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 06:56, 13 November 2007 (CST) | ::::The artwork is really poor to make a good determination. I looked at the rear engine pod configuration to get an idea. We could simply just call it a "battlestar" and leave the class out of it. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 06:56, 13 November 2007 (CST) | ||