| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Chronos' Class== | | ==Chronos' Class== |
| Why is the ''Chronos'' stated to be a Mercury class battlestar? It looks nothing like one, but more like the Valkyrie. --[[User:Kregano|Kregano]] 12:48, 12 November 2007 (CST) | | Why is the ''Chronos'' stated to be a Mercury class battlestar? It looks nothing like one, but more like the Valkyrie. --[[User:Kregano|Kregano]] 12:48, 12 November 2007 (CST) |
| : The assumption seems to be drawn from the fact that Cain calls ''Chronos'' a "sister ship". Although I would tend to agree that it looks more like a ''Valkyrie'' type than a ''Mercury'' class. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 12:51, 12 November 2007 (CST)
| |
| ::Maybe leave it as it is, but add a note to clear up the confusion. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:48, 12 November 2007 (CST)
| |
| :::In looking at the picture, it appears more likely that it is a ''Valkyrie'' type, since it only has one landing bay per pod. I didn't see a second bay underneath, a la ''Pegasus''. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:50, 12 November 2007 (CST)
| |
| ::::The artwork is really poor to make a good determination. I looked at the rear engine pod configuration to get an idea. We could simply just call it a "battlestar" and leave the class out of it. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 06:56, 13 November 2007 (CST)
| |
| :::::Done. I added a note though, since does have a resemblance to ''Valkyrie''. Mostly the forward section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:14, 13 November 2007 (CST)
| |
