Editing Talk:Characters eliminated from suspicion/Archive 1
Discussion page of Characters eliminated from suspicion/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
:{{Vd}} You make a good case. Redundancy is bad enough, but orphaned redundancy...? Wasted space. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:00, 7 December 2007 (CST) | :{{Vd}} You make a good case. Redundancy is bad enough, but orphaned redundancy...? Wasted space. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:00, 7 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:{{vd}} Agreed. This already presented well enough on the speculation article itself. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:03, 7 December 2007 (CST) | :{{vd}} Agreed. This already presented well enough on the speculation article itself. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:03, 7 December 2007 (CST) | ||