Editing Talk:Blackbird/Archive 1
Discussion page of Blackbird/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:::: Huh. I hadn't thought of most of those things. I got the impression that it was a Blackbird (implicitly Mark I) named Laura. So, I wouldn't call it a Viper. But there's nothing conclusive yet. --[[User:Day|Day]] 15:23, 19 September 2005 (EDT) | :::: Huh. I hadn't thought of most of those things. I got the impression that it was a Blackbird (implicitly Mark I) named Laura. So, I wouldn't call it a Viper. But there's nothing conclusive yet. --[[User:Day|Day]] 15:23, 19 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
:::::In the blog I linked to below, David Eick says that it's definitely ''not'' a Viper, but something completely new. He also says it's the only stealth ship in the Fleet, which I guess might say somehting about the Colonial military mindset. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 14:28, 20 September 2005 (EDT) | :::::In the blog I linked to below, David Eick says that it's definitely ''not'' a Viper, but something completely new. He also says it's the only stealth ship in the Fleet, which I guess might say somehting about the Colonial military mindset. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 14:28, 20 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
::::::Well, we wouldn't know if the Colonial Military had stealth craft before the attack or not, since none of them escaped with ''Galactica''. --[[User: | ::::::Well, we wouldn't know if the Colonial Military had stealth craft before the attack or not, since none of them escaped with ''Galactica''. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:45, 20 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
*The latest video blog ([http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/bts/videoblog/ here]) has Eick calling it the Blackbird, not the Laura, so I guess that is the accepted name afterall. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 11:20, 20 September 2005 (EDT) | *The latest video blog ([http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/bts/videoblog/ here]) has Eick calling it the Blackbird, not the Laura, so I guess that is the accepted name afterall. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 11:20, 20 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
Blackbird is the name of the ship type (like "Viper" or "Raptor"), Laura is the name of the ship itself. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 17:08, 25 September 2005 (EDT) | Blackbird is the name of the ship type (like "Viper" or "Raptor"), Laura is the name of the ship itself. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 17:08, 25 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
:Apollo just called it the Blackbird in "Pegasus". --[[User: | :Apollo just called it the Blackbird in "Pegasus". --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:28, 25 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
:With only one Blackbird, the group will call it only by its kind's name. If more are made, maybe the nicknames will be used, maybe not. This nicknaming was common in WWII on bomber aircraft, but right now it's just an honorific. Militarily, "Blackbird" rolls off the tongue better and appears as the common usage right now. [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:37, 26 September 2005 (EDT) | :With only one Blackbird, the group will call it only by its kind's name. If more are made, maybe the nicknames will be used, maybe not. This nicknaming was common in WWII on bomber aircraft, but right now it's just an honorific. Militarily, "Blackbird" rolls off the tongue better and appears as the common usage right now. [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:37, 26 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
::::::It doesn't matter that the Blackbird could have been detected on DRADIS just before it jumped back to the Fleet, the time between power up and the jump itself was only a second or two, not nearly enough time for a firing solution, never mind actual ordnance to traverse the distance between the Basestars and the Blackbird itself. --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 10:15, 12 September 2006 (CDT) | ::::::It doesn't matter that the Blackbird could have been detected on DRADIS just before it jumped back to the Fleet, the time between power up and the jump itself was only a second or two, not nearly enough time for a firing solution, never mind actual ordnance to traverse the distance between the Basestars and the Blackbird itself. --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 10:15, 12 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
The FTL drive could've come from [[Raptor 305]], scrapped in "[[Fragged]]" --[[User: | The FTL drive could've come from [[Raptor 305]], scrapped in "[[Fragged]]" --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:01, 7 January 2006 (EST) | ||
: It's also possible that it could have come from [[Pegasus_(RDM)|Pegasus]], considering that it was mostly likely on the ship when [[Lee_Adama|Apollo]] gave [[Kara_Thrace|Starbuck]] the equipment for the original recon mission for the R.S. --[[User:Sgtpayne|Sgtpayne]] 23:22, 19 January 2006 (EST) | : It's also possible that it could have come from [[Pegasus_(RDM)|Pegasus]], considering that it was mostly likely on the ship when [[Lee_Adama|Apollo]] gave [[Kara_Thrace|Starbuck]] the equipment for the original recon mission for the R.S. --[[User:Sgtpayne|Sgtpayne]] 23:22, 19 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
Uh, Spence, guys... are we absolutely '''''sure''''' about this: | Uh, Spence, guys... are we absolutely '''''sure''''' about this: | ||
[[ | [[Image:Bscap101.jpg]] | ||
It looks to me that Starbuck popped up on Pegasus' Dradis out near the outer reaches of its sensitivity... well before anyone reported a visual. (Or did you mean, Spence, that Starbuck peek-a-booed the fleet before they saw her?) | It looks to me that Starbuck popped up on Pegasus' Dradis out near the outer reaches of its sensitivity... well before anyone reported a visual. (Or did you mean, Spence, that Starbuck peek-a-booed the fleet before they saw her?) | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
:::*4) As RDM stated in the podcast, Starbuck WANTED to be seen. As we saw in FotP, it's not stealth ''all the time''; that is, powering down non=essential systems, etc. Basically, after talking with Apollo, Starbuck was trying to get everyone's attention to stop everyone. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 16:37, 22 January 2006 (EST) | :::*4) As RDM stated in the podcast, Starbuck WANTED to be seen. As we saw in FotP, it's not stealth ''all the time''; that is, powering down non=essential systems, etc. Basically, after talking with Apollo, Starbuck was trying to get everyone's attention to stop everyone. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 16:37, 22 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::::Agree, particularly point 4. --[[User: | ::::Agree, particularly point 4. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:54, 22 January 2006 (EST) | ||
Regarding the edit on January 27th, it was posted that "The Blackbird was likely detected only because of Starbuck transmitting a response message to Apollo aboard a Raptor, another testament to her stealth prowess" (I originally thought it was meant that it was detected in the battle); however, this should be removed by the very fact that the paragraphs immediately above what I'm writing now exist: we don't know at all that transmitting a message had anything to do with it, and the podcast seems to imply that it was because she turned on her engines full blast. This line should be removed.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 00:00, 27 January 2006 (EST) | Regarding the edit on January 27th, it was posted that "The Blackbird was likely detected only because of Starbuck transmitting a response message to Apollo aboard a Raptor, another testament to her stealth prowess" (I originally thought it was meant that it was detected in the battle); however, this should be removed by the very fact that the paragraphs immediately above what I'm writing now exist: we don't know at all that transmitting a message had anything to do with it, and the podcast seems to imply that it was because she turned on her engines full blast. This line should be removed.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 00:00, 27 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:That is an entirely reasonable point. --[[User: | :That is an entirely reasonable point. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:14, 27 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::My point is entirely reasonable? Thanks.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 01:37, 27 January 2006 (EST) | ::My point is entirely reasonable? Thanks.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 01:37, 27 January 2006 (EST) | ||