Editing Talk:Battlestar Galactica (2003 game)/Archive 1
Discussion page of Battlestar Galactica (2003 game)/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:(By the way, typing is hard sometimes) | :(By the way, typing is hard sometimes) | ||
::Well, the revised video game script did originate with RDM. That's why I think that we can take it (with a large grain of salt) as instructive information where nothing else is available - subordinate in canonicity to actual episode content and RDM's public comments in his blog and podcasts. --[[User: | ::Well, the revised video game script did originate with RDM. That's why I think that we can take it (with a large grain of salt) as instructive information where nothing else is available - subordinate in canonicity to actual episode content and RDM's public comments in his blog and podcasts. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:00, 18 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
:No it can't. Why? Because most of the information in it is just made up for purposes of the game: the storyline is notoriously shoddy. Long story short: something WE made up would be just as accurate as the Video Game. We should note it under "Notes" but it is totally non-canonical. --Ricimer, 18 Sept, 2005 | :No it can't. Why? Because most of the information in it is just made up for purposes of the game: the storyline is notoriously shoddy. Long story short: something WE made up would be just as accurate as the Video Game. We should note it under "Notes" but it is totally non-canonical. --Ricimer, 18 Sept, 2005 | ||
::At least part of the game script was suggested by RDM, although his input may not have been followed carefully. --[[User: | ::At least part of the game script was suggested by RDM, although his input may not have been followed carefully. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:02, 18 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
To bring this topic up to date: The video game, as is the official comic, is an official product, but since it contradicts with many aspects of both series, please consider the video game and its characters and objects as a separate continuity. Use the <nowiki>{{separatecontinuity}}</nowiki> tag to mark any article derived from this video game.--[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 23:26, 1 July 2006 (CDT) | To bring this topic up to date: The video game, as is the official comic, is an official product, but since it contradicts with many aspects of both series, please consider the video game and its characters and objects as a separate continuity. Use the <nowiki>{{separatecontinuity}}</nowiki> tag to mark any article derived from this video game.--[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 23:26, 1 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Please move article to [[Battlestar Galactica (2003 game)]], for consistency/sanity (there are two games now; see [[BSG Arcade]] which also needs a more intelligible name). — <b><span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]</span></b> [[[User talk:SMcCandlish|talk]]] [[[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|cont]]] <b>‹(-¿-)›</b> 04:51, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | Please move article to [[Battlestar Galactica (2003 game)]], for consistency/sanity (there are two games now; see [[BSG Arcade]] which also needs a more intelligible name). — <b><span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]</span></b> [[[User talk:SMcCandlish|talk]]] [[[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|cont]]] <b>‹(-¿-)›</b> 04:51, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Done. Also moving articles like [[Raider (Video Game)]] to [[Raider (2003 Video Game)]] and updating links. We'll also have to reform the category system on this point, with [[ | :Done. Also moving articles like [[Raider (Video Game)]] to [[Raider (2003 Video Game)]] and updating links. We'll also have to reform the category system on this point, with [[Category:Video Game]] becoming parent cat for [[:Category:2003 Video Game]] and [[:Category:2007 Video Game]]. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 07:18, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:For consistency, shouldn't that simply be [[Raider (2003 game)]]? The "video" disambiguation wouldn't be needed unless there were also a [[Raider (2003 board game)]] or something. And "video" and "game" aren't proper nouns, so no need for capitalization. :-) NB: I already fixed the disambiguation between the two ''BG'' console games, in their hatnotes. — <b><span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]</span></b> [[[User talk:SMcCandlish|talk]]] [[[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|cont]]] <b>‹(-¿-)›</b> 07:41, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | :For consistency, shouldn't that simply be [[Raider (2003 game)]]? The "video" disambiguation wouldn't be needed unless there were also a [[Raider (2003 board game)]] or something. And "video" and "game" aren't proper nouns, so no need for capitalization. :-) NB: I already fixed the disambiguation between the two ''BG'' console games, in their hatnotes. — <b><span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]</span></b> [[[User talk:SMcCandlish|talk]]] [[[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|cont]]] <b>‹(-¿-)›</b> 07:41, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
::True and true. However, (Video Game) seemed to be more or less of an established standard. If we decide it should be (2003 game) after all, I'll leave the dirty work of converting that to the one who came up with (Video Game) in the first place ;) Although it may also be decided (out of laziness), that (2003 Video Game) should be the standard and that this article should be renamed. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 07:55, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ::True and true. However, (Video Game) seemed to be more or less of an established standard. If we decide it should be (2003 game) after all, I'll leave the dirty work of converting that to the one who came up with (Video Game) in the first place ;) Although it may also be decided (out of laziness), that (2003 Video Game) should be the standard and that this article should be renamed. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 07:55, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
::::A new section at [[Talk:Video Game]] would be the best place, I think. Our equivalent of the Village Pump is the [[BW:TANK|Think Tank]], but that's really meant for larger things than a disambig decision. About over-disambiguating, we generally don't do that ([[Viper (2003 Video Game)]] because we also have [[Viper (RDM)]] and [[Viper (TOS)]], but [[Iphigenia]] isn't disambiguated). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 15:04, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ::::A new section at [[Talk:Video Game]] would be the best place, I think. Our equivalent of the Village Pump is the [[BW:TANK|Think Tank]], but that's really meant for larger things than a disambig decision. About over-disambiguating, we generally don't do that ([[Viper (2003 Video Game)]] because we also have [[Viper (RDM)]] and [[Viper (TOS)]], but [[Iphigenia]] isn't disambiguated). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 15:04, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
::::Generally, we don't disambiguate when there's only one of something. As for general discussions, the [[BW:TANK|Think Tank]] is a good place for major discussions of scope; we also have the [[BW:WQ|Wikipedians' Quorum]] for discussions. And for administrator/chief related matters we have the [[BW:AN|Administrators' noticeboard]].-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 15:13, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ::::Generally, we don't disambiguate when there's only one of something. As for general discussions, the [[BW:TANK|Think Tank]] is a good place for major discussions of scope; we also have the [[BW:WQ|Wikipedians' Quorum]] for discussions. And for administrator/chief related matters we have the [[BW:AN|Administrators' noticeboard]].-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 15:13, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ||