Editing Talk:Anti-assault battery/Archive 1
Discussion page of Anti-assault battery/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We could either use the command bunker (which, it sounds like might not even really be necessarily close to the batteries) or we could use the scans of the defensive systems from ''Galactica''. They're meaningless objects on a scanner screen, but it is better than nothing. I've got caps of both, but wanted some thoughts before wasting space.--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:46, 5 June 2007 (CDT) | We could either use the command bunker (which, it sounds like might not even really be necessarily close to the batteries) or we could use the scans of the defensive systems from ''Galactica''. They're meaningless objects on a scanner screen, but it is better than nothing. I've got caps of both, but wanted some thoughts before wasting space.--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:46, 5 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
: I think the scan would be better than the bunker picture, if not to demonstrate the positioning of the assault batteries. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 07:34, 6 June 2007 (CDT) | : I think the scan would be better than the bunker picture, if not to demonstrate the positioning of the assault batteries. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 07:34, 6 June 2007 (CDT) | ||