Editing Talk:Adama (1980)/Archive 1
Discussion page of Adama (1980)/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::The issue with that is that ''1980'' is not considered canon in relation to TOS, whereas all of Trek (with the possible exception of ''The Animated Series'') is all in one canon. I do know what you mean by making this easier, but, on the other hand, since the two continuities are not directly related to one another, it wouldn't seem correct to put it all under the same article either. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 04:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | :::The issue with that is that ''1980'' is not considered canon in relation to TOS, whereas all of Trek (with the possible exception of ''The Animated Series'') is all in one canon. I do know what you mean by making this easier, but, on the other hand, since the two continuities are not directly related to one another, it wouldn't seem correct to put it all under the same article either. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 04:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Note 1 at http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Battlestar_Wiki:Separate_continuity ''explicitly'' contradicts what you're saying. "Despite the unpopularity of the short-lived Galactica 1980 series among Original Series fans, the aired events, characters and situations presented there define it as canonical (albeit sometimes contradictory). Do not use the separate continuity feature to mark Galactica 1980 articles." In other words, they are considered part of the ''same'' continuity despite contradictions. --[[User:PeepsMcJuggs|PeepsMcJuggs]] 02:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ::::Note 1 at http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Battlestar_Wiki:Separate_continuity ''explicitly'' contradicts what you're saying. "Despite the unpopularity of the short-lived Galactica 1980 series among Original Series fans, the aired events, characters and situations presented there define it as canonical (albeit sometimes contradictory). Do not use the separate continuity feature to mark Galactica 1980 articles." In other words, they are considered part of the ''same'' continuity despite contradictions. --[[User:PeepsMcJuggs|PeepsMcJuggs]] 02:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ||