| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Family tree == | | == Family tree == |
| Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | | Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC) |
| : Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::: Given Ruth's growing importance in the series, particularly starting with "[[Gravedancing]]," I agree that she should be added. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 15:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
