Editing Philosophy in Battlestar Galactica
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Philosophy in general== | == Philosophy in general== | ||
'''Philosophy''' has been called "the study of study itself, | '''Philosophy''' has been called "the study of study itself", or "the study of thought". The nature and purpose of philosophy each begin with clear, logical, and exhaustive [[w:thought|thought]]. Philosophy is can be recognized as a process as well as an an end product of its own process. | ||
== Role of Philosophy in Battlestar Galactica == | == Role of Philosophy in Battlestar Galactica == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Naturally, these dilemmas can occur within contexts as diverse as [[w:Political science|law, politics]], [[w:Economics|economics]], [[w:sociology|sociology, criminology,]] and occasionally relate to specific issues involving sciences such as [[w:Medicine|medicine]], [[w:Biochemistry|biochemistry]] and [[w:Artificial intelligence|robotics]]. For example, artificial intelligence such as that of the Cylons raises questions about how whether they should be treated as people or "thing"s. | Naturally, these dilemmas can occur within contexts as diverse as [[w:Political science|law, politics]], [[w:Economics|economics]], [[w:sociology|sociology, criminology,]] and occasionally relate to specific issues involving sciences such as [[w:Medicine|medicine]], [[w:Biochemistry|biochemistry]] and [[w:Artificial intelligence|robotics]]. For example, artificial intelligence such as that of the Cylons raises questions about how whether they should be treated as people or "thing"s. | ||
Accordingly, the viewpoints of various fans and detractors of Battlestar Galactica, some more philosophical than others, have been assembled in "[[So Say We All: An Unauthorized Collection of Thoughts and Opinions on Battlestar Galactica]], | Accordingly, the viewpoints of various fans and detractors of Battlestar Galactica, some more philosophical than others, have been assembled in "[[So Say We All: An Unauthorized Collection of Thoughts and Opinions on Battlestar Galactica]]", by [[Richard Hatch]]. Topics such as artificial intelligence, terrorism, and politics are discussed from the viewpoints of various authors. | ||
== Human and [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylon]] Philosophy == | == Human and [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylon]] Philosophy == | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
*The choice of a [[w:Lesser Evil|lesser of two evils principle]] is one common result of the philosophical dilemma. Here, one choice from among multiple unsavory choices must be made. Admiral Adama's decision to save ''Galactica'' by jumping away from [[New Caprica]] in "[[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part II]]" is undesirable but preferable to facing a superior inbound Cylon force. | *The choice of a [[w:Lesser Evil|lesser of two evils principle]] is one common result of the philosophical dilemma. Here, one choice from among multiple unsavory choices must be made. Admiral Adama's decision to save ''Galactica'' by jumping away from [[New Caprica]] in "[[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part II]]" is undesirable but preferable to facing a superior inbound Cylon force. | ||
*The philosophical concept of [[w:eternal recurrence|eternal recurrence]] addressed by Arthur Schopenhauer and the Stoics is roughly analogous to the suggestions repeatedly voiced by [[Leoben Conoy]] in "[[Flesh and Bone]], | *The philosophical concept of [[w:eternal recurrence|eternal recurrence]] addressed by Arthur Schopenhauer and the Stoics is roughly analogous to the suggestions repeatedly voiced by [[Leoben Conoy]] in "[[Flesh and Bone]]", when he says "all of this has happened before, and it will happen again". Time is viewed as repeating or recurring in cyclical state of timelessness rather than a novel linear progression. | ||
==Moral Dilemmas prompting philosophical evaluation== | ==Moral Dilemmas prompting philosophical evaluation== | ||
'''Free Will and Responsibility''': The selfish and cowardly [[Gaius Baltar]] struggles continually with the concepts of personal responsibility and free will despite coaching from Caprica-Six, who places emphasizes the importance of rational free will [[Caprica-Six]]. In "[[Taking A Break From All Your Worries]], | '''Free Will and Responsibility''': The selfish and cowardly [[Gaius Baltar]] struggles continually with the concepts of personal responsibility and free will despite coaching from Caprica-Six, who places emphasizes the importance of rational free will [[Caprica-Six]]. In "[[Taking A Break From All Your Worries]]", prior to interrogation under the affects of an [[interrogation drug|hallucinogen]], Caprica-Six asks [[Gaius Baltar]] if "without free will", he would have any dignity whatsoever- and whether "[[God (RDM)|God]] can even pity such a creature". This may be a reference to [[w:Neo-Kantianism|Kantian philosophy]] which links human dignity to rational choice, free will, and accountability for one's actions, and further classifies these things as prereqisites to the establishment of human dignity. An extension of this is that the recognition of human dignity necessitates accountability for actions, implying a requirement for the harsh punishment of bad deeds when committed by rational minds. | ||
Gaius Baltar struggles to grasp this concept throughout the episode, breaking down the elements of his past choices and later exclaiming "I am not responsible!, | Gaius Baltar struggles to grasp this concept throughout the episode, breaking down the elements of his past choices and later exclaiming "I am not responsible!", an argument propounded by key [[w:Nazism|Nazi]]s during the [[w:Nuremberg Trials|Nuremberg Trials]] who claimed to have simply followed orders- following groupthink consensus without exercising their own rational autonomy. | ||
Throughout the season, cylons begin to defy their own consensus and status quo, act in their own interests, and make individual choices despite harsh consequences. In Season 4, boomer makes a decision against the consensus of her own model, a move from determinism to individualism. This is a sign of the Cylon's moral evolution, following their more obvious intellectual (learning) and physical (invention of new models and technologies) evolutions. | Throughout the season, cylons begin to defy their own consensus and status quo, act in their own interests, and make individual choices despite harsh consequences. In Season 4, boomer makes a decision against the consensus of her own model, a move from determinism to individualism. This is a sign of the Cylon's moral evolution, following their more obvious intellectual (learning) and physical (invention of new models and technologies) evolutions. | ||
'''Punishment of Cylons''': Soon after the discovery of Cylons in the midst of humans aboard Galactica, the punishment of Cylons escalates along a familiar slippery slope. The draconian beating of Sharon Valeri during interrogation by human captors. Summary execution through the [[Airlock|airlocking]] of "dangerous" Cylon captives also occurs around this time. The wanton beating and rape of [[Number Six]] by [[Alastair Thorne|humans]] eventually follows, apparently serving little purpose other than to satisfy bloodlust and provide recreation for some the crew. This raises philosophical questions in the minds of viewers about whether these actions are in any way logical, justifiable, necessary, or inexcusable. Obviously these instances are presented to viewers in such a way that they run the gamut within these classifications, but with plenty of room for thought. Additionally, larger questions are raised about whether Cylons in their various forms (centurions, raiders, and "humanoid" models) should be treated like humans, like inanimate "machines, | '''Punishment of Cylons''': Soon after the discovery of Cylons in the midst of humans aboard Galactica, the punishment of Cylons escalates along a familiar slippery slope. The draconian beating of Sharon Valeri during interrogation by human captors. Summary execution through the [[Airlock|airlocking]] of "dangerous" Cylon captives also occurs around this time. The wanton beating and rape of [[Number Six]] by [[Alastair Thorne|humans]] eventually follows, apparently serving little purpose other than to satisfy bloodlust and provide recreation for some the crew. This raises philosophical questions in the minds of viewers about whether these actions are in any way logical, justifiable, necessary, or inexcusable. Obviously these instances are presented to viewers in such a way that they run the gamut within these classifications, but with plenty of room for thought. Additionally, larger questions are raised about whether Cylons in their various forms (centurions, raiders, and "humanoid" models) should be treated like humans, like inanimate "machines", or like something else. These "larger" questions are more on the cutting edge, topics that are currently still being prodded by philosophers in the current age. This line of thought continues in season 4 as the raiders are lobotomized, the centurions are given free will, and Cylons argue about "playing God". | ||
==Application of Political Philosophy to Battlestar Galactica == | ==Application of Political Philosophy to Battlestar Galactica == | ||
* Viewers can apply [[w:Political philosophy|Political philosophy]] to the various crises faced by the civilian and military leadership in ''Battlestar Galactica''. In "[[Dirty Hands]], | * Viewers can apply [[w:Political philosophy|Political philosophy]] to the various crises faced by the civilian and military leadership in ''Battlestar Galactica''. In "[[Dirty Hands]]", tensions arise between [[Galen Tyrol|Chief Tyrol]] and [[William Adama|Admiral Adama]] over Adama's strict [[w:utilitarianism|utilitarian]] emphasis on the obedience of his crew and order within the [[The Fleet (RDM)|Fleet]] versus Chief Tyrol's populist appeals on behalf of tylium plant laborers. | ||
This relates back to [[Laura Roslin|President Roslin]]'s similiar stewardship of individual rights, [[w:autonomy|autonomy]] and [[w:metaethics|ethical considerations]] in the face of utilitarian and military neccessity. | This relates back to [[Laura Roslin|President Roslin]]'s similiar stewardship of individual rights, [[w:autonomy|autonomy]] and [[w:metaethics|ethical considerations]] in the face of utilitarian and military neccessity. | ||