| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
|
| |
|
| :No clue. I use Firefox exclusively for my editing and viewing. I checked the image here and in both articles it appears. I use version 1.5 now. How does it appear to you and what version of FF are you using? Any extensions installed? -[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:50, 26 January 2006 (EST) | | :No clue. I use Firefox exclusively for my editing and viewing. I checked the image here and in both articles it appears. I use version 1.5 now. How does it appear to you and what version of FF are you using? Any extensions installed? -[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:50, 26 January 2006 (EST) |
|
| |
| ::I've got 1.5, but I do have several extensions installed (adblock is a must). The thumbnail box appears, but where an image would be there is a duplicate of the caption text for the thumbnail. Clicking on it takes me to the image page where, once again, I can't see the image, but instead see the filename of the image. If I click on the filename, it does display the image (against a white background, as it is JUST displaying the image). The same thing happened with Walker. I uploaded that one several times, thinking it was something wrong with the image, but stopped when I discovered that it looked fine in IE. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:59, 26 January 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::Huh. Never mind, I guess. I just installed IE Tab 1.0.7, and that seems to have done the trick. The images display now. Strange. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:23, 26 January 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Solution: adblock. The image on [[Sheba]] didn't show up (like the others above) after I installed adblock (on a new machine). I whitelisted this site, and they show up again. Something in the image name/address must have popped a false positive against filterset.G. In case anybody was wondering... --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 00:26, 20 February 2006 (EST)
| |
