| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| |
|
| :[[Image:BSG WIKI User.png]] ? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:25, 27 April 2006 (CDT) | | :[[Image:BSG WIKI User.png]] ? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:25, 27 April 2006 (CDT) |
| ::Exactly. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 14:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::This is used for the actor image and "user" image tags. The silhouette (not the BSG logo) with a ? is going to be used for Anonymous (Where we can't find a picture), so something that is distictive for characters. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :::Eh. I like it. We already use the sillhouette in some character contexts, e.g. the unknown cylon numbers. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 12:32, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::::Yeah, but i think we should use this sillhouette that is merc did. Just trying to keep the "filenames" sane for "site images" at least. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:36, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| I don't think we should have a specific character to use in the logo, especially in the world of BSG where we have two "factions" of characters the Cylons and Colonials. This is why I prefer silhouette for generic "people" icons --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 02:38, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| According to the new rule of keeping things minimal there is no need for this anymore surely. We arnt supposed to post placeholder pictures anymore --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 16:37, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
| |