| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
|
| |
|
| Just a rating might be acceptable, but under no circumstances should we have comments about the episodes --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:38, 15 February 2007 (CST) | | Just a rating might be acceptable, but under no circumstances should we have comments about the episodes --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:38, 15 February 2007 (CST) |
|
| |
| : I am firmly against this, as we are a reference. Having "ratings" (a la Lurker's Guide) deters from this. So, {{oppose}}. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 07:50, 15 February 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| ::I concur with Joe and had the same reaction to the concept before I read his comments. Battlestar Wiki is a reference, and we have strived to keep a NPOV in episode articles and supporting articles. While, for fun, this could be done as a separate article in a portal, we would have to go through great pains to moderate it. That violates our policy that the wiki is not a chat forum. As well, I {{oppose}}. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:15, 15 February 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| :: I {{oppose}} for the reasons mentioned above. I do like to find out how people regard a certain episode, maybe we could implement ratings on the talk pages? --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 09:40, 15 February 2007 (CST)
| |
| :::But there are over a dozen forums where you can see people rating episodes. I just don't see why this needs to be done here as well --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:42, 15 February 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| ::I {{oppose}} as well, this is an objective resource, not a place for that kind of thing. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 09:45, 15 February 2007 (CST)
| |