| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| :: Most of the images are not in 16:9 format, and appear to have been taken by a camera. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 22:19, 5 March 2007 (CST) | | :: Most of the images are not in 16:9 format, and appear to have been taken by a camera. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 22:19, 5 March 2007 (CST) |
| :::Yeah, he promotional images are probably professionally taken and not stills from the video footage. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 09:00, 9 March 2007 (CST) | | :::Yeah, he promotional images are probably professionally taken and not stills from the video footage. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 09:00, 9 March 2007 (CST) |
|
| |
| == More discussion? ==
| |
|
| |
| Did we need more discussion on this issue before going ahead for a formal vote? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 09:07, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :We can vote on it, but the proposal appears to lack information on ''who'' is going to do the handiwork. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:27, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :: Right, we may want to get that ironed out before a formal vote. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 20:54, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
| |
| :::While it sounds at first like an overwhelming task, but it'd be greatly simplified by a report of all images ordered by filesize. Work your way from the top until the filesizes are such that they couldn't support a "restricted" resolution, and you'd be done. Then you just have to keep an eye on the "latest images" to make sure nothing new comes up. Or if the report could be made permanent (special page, or whatever), then you could continue to use that to catch new offenders. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 21:20, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Notes on change ==
| |
|
| |
| I've gone ahead and placed this proposal under "proposals without consensus", since there isn't really a course of action here. Also, since we weren't targeted by NBCU for the takedown, unlike DrewCypher, et al., something like this may not be necessary at all, and the current tagging and image usage procedures seem to be effective. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 11:40, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
| |