Editing Battlestar Wiki talk:Podcast Transcripts
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Podcast Transcripts
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:This sort of thing actually has very little to do with legality. Do I personally believe that typing up transcripts of freely available podcasts to aid in searching for citations constitues a copyright violation? No. Would my beliefs hold sway in a court of law if Universal wished to vigorously prosecute me? Probably not. Do I even have the resources to defend myself in such a case? No. | :This sort of thing actually has very little to do with legality. Do I personally believe that typing up transcripts of freely available podcasts to aid in searching for citations constitues a copyright violation? No. Would my beliefs hold sway in a court of law if Universal wished to vigorously prosecute me? Probably not. Do I even have the resources to defend myself in such a case? No. | ||
:So in the end, Universal essentially gets to decide whether it's a copyright violation or not. That decision has very little to do with the letter of the law, and a lot to do with the comparative depth of our pockets. Essentially, if the copyright holders decide they don't like this, then there's nothing we can do to stop them from asking us to take it down, in which case we will do so graciously. Until then, it seems fairly harmless to continue. --[[User: | :So in the end, Universal essentially gets to decide whether it's a copyright violation or not. That decision has very little to do with the letter of the law, and a lot to do with the comparative depth of our pockets. Essentially, if the copyright holders decide they don't like this, then there's nothing we can do to stop them from asking us to take it down, in which case we will do so graciously. Until then, it seems fairly harmless to continue. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:01, 14 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:Of course, Joe has ultimate jurisdiction over the wiki and any projects we decide to host. If he is uncomfortable with this for any reason, I will gladly take it off-site. --[[User: | :Of course, Joe has ultimate jurisdiction over the wiki and any projects we decide to host. If he is uncomfortable with this for any reason, I will gladly take it off-site. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:07, 14 December 2005 (EST) | ||
I just thought I'd point [http://members.tripod.com/john_larocque/tns/archive.html this] site out. It has episode summaries that have podcast commentary transcribed below them. Unfortunately, the comments are broken off into paragraphs, and don't appear to be organized into acts like you guys are. May be useful as a double-check, though, if nothing else. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:27, 27 December 2005 (EST) | I just thought I'd point [http://members.tripod.com/john_larocque/tns/archive.html this] site out. It has episode summaries that have podcast commentary transcribed below them. Unfortunately, the comments are broken off into paragraphs, and don't appear to be organized into acts like you guys are. May be useful as a double-check, though, if nothing else. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:27, 27 December 2005 (EST) | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
It'd be awesome if during the gap between now and Season 3 we could manage to get "caught up" on the transcription backlog. That way, going forward there would only be one per week that we'd need to do, which would be a lot less overwhelming. Laineylain and Misco have made a lot of progress, but there are a LOT of episodes left to do. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:07, 12 March 2006 (CST) | It'd be awesome if during the gap between now and Season 3 we could manage to get "caught up" on the transcription backlog. That way, going forward there would only be one per week that we'd need to do, which would be a lot less overwhelming. Laineylain and Misco have made a lot of progress, but there are a LOT of episodes left to do. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:07, 12 March 2006 (CST) | ||
:Any suggestions on priority order for working through the episodes? Chronological or reverse chronological? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:51, 17 April 2006 (CDT) | :Any suggestions on priority order for working through the episodes? Chronological or reverse chronological? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:51, 17 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I guess I'd prefer reverse chronological, but I don't see that it matters much. It should really be whatever the transcriber is interested in (I don't think anyone's going to shed any tears if "Sacrifice" goes untranscribed for a while). --[[User: | ::I guess I'd prefer reverse chronological, but I don't see that it matters much. It should really be whatever the transcriber is interested in (I don't think anyone's going to shed any tears if "Sacrifice" goes untranscribed for a while). --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:12, 17 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::I've been doing the ones that interest me. I'm off for a trip to Vegas, but will get some LDYB2 transcription work done when I return next week. -- [[User:Laineylain|Laineylain]] 13:07, 17 April 2006 (CDT) | :::I've been doing the ones that interest me. I'm off for a trip to Vegas, but will get some LDYB2 transcription work done when I return next week. -- [[User:Laineylain|Laineylain]] 13:07, 17 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
:We've got something of a "backlog" of podcasts needing verification. I'd chip in, but I'm not eligible. As for my next target... I'll try to refrain from finishing the "in progress" ones for a little while, to see if the original transcribers will continue where they left off. I guess "Scar" would be next. (There's still a TON left to do on Season Two.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:40, 9 June 2006 (CDT) | :We've got something of a "backlog" of podcasts needing verification. I'd chip in, but I'm not eligible. As for my next target... I'll try to refrain from finishing the "in progress" ones for a little while, to see if the original transcribers will continue where they left off. I guess "Scar" would be next. (There's still a TON left to do on Season Two.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:40, 9 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Is like.. well... it was very hard to find what I was looking for. Ideas for orginziation? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 11:32, 8 May 2006 (CDT) | Is like.. well... it was very hard to find what I was looking for. Ideas for orginziation? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 11:32, 8 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:It'd be nice to edit the particular episode you're checking in, instead of "checkins", but the alternative is a really huge TOC, isn't it? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:35, 8 May 2006 (CDT) | :It'd be nice to edit the particular episode you're checking in, instead of "checkins", but the alternative is a really huge TOC, isn't it? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:35, 8 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Shane, I do appreciate your suggestion vis a vis templates - I can see why our current system is sub-optimal. However, I'm not sure a template system is the best answer. SV, I don't think a "really huge TOC" would be necessarily horrible - this page is just for us to use to keep track of things. It doesn't have to look beautiful. --[[User: | ::Shane, I do appreciate your suggestion vis a vis templates - I can see why our current system is sub-optimal. However, I'm not sure a template system is the best answer. SV, I don't think a "really huge TOC" would be necessarily horrible - this page is just for us to use to keep track of things. It doesn't have to look beautiful. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:20, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::Well, then I may experiment with making the next one I work on a "header" so that it would be able to be isolated in editing. I'm taking a short break from transcribing, though, as I've outpaced "verification" (and I want to avoid the dreaded podcast burnout). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:35, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | :::Well, then I may experiment with making the next one I work on a "header" so that it would be able to be isolated in editing. I'm taking a short break from transcribing, though, as I've outpaced "verification" (and I want to avoid the dreaded podcast burnout). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:35, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::So my experiments with headers have not fared to well, having been repeatedly replaced with the bullets. I'm all for uniformity... but it's a huge pain to scroll down through all the "Season 2 podcasts" to find the correct slot to add the four ~'s to. I was planning on switching back to the bullet after I was done with a given episode... --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:45, 30 May 2006 (CDT) | ::::So my experiments with headers have not fared to well, having been repeatedly replaced with the bullets. I'm all for uniformity... but it's a huge pain to scroll down through all the "Season 2 podcasts" to find the correct slot to add the four ~'s to. I was planning on switching back to the bullet after I was done with a given episode... --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:45, 30 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
That's about it. Comments? Suggestions? Action? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:54, 3 June 2006 (CDT) | That's about it. Comments? Suggestions? Action? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:54, 3 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Good thoughts. --[[User: | :Good thoughts. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 13:03, 3 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I like the episode data idea, in that it would give the completed podcasts a lot more visibility. <strike>The only downside is having to update all the TOS and 1980 eps to add it as well, as well as any other future series that might not have podcasts either. Would it be worthwhile to split off an "RDM Episode Data" template (kind of a subclass of "episode data")?</strike> Removing the completed podcasts would clean up this page a LOT, and make navigation easier. Good point on creating a listing of completed ones though, or otherwise providing access. Maybe add some fields to the podcast template that aren't displayed for the checkin/verify times? The commented block would be easier, though. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:23, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | ::I like the episode data idea, in that it would give the completed podcasts a lot more visibility. <strike>The only downside is having to update all the TOS and 1980 eps to add it as well, as well as any other future series that might not have podcasts either. Would it be worthwhile to split off an "RDM Episode Data" template (kind of a subclass of "episode data")?</strike> Removing the completed podcasts would clean up this page a LOT, and make navigation easier. Good point on creating a listing of completed ones though, or otherwise providing access. Maybe add some fields to the podcast template that aren't displayed for the checkin/verify times? The commented block would be easier, though. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:23, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::I don't like the template. We could, however, replace the list of checkins with a single link to the completed podcast. --[[User: | :::I don't like the template. We could, however, replace the list of checkins with a single link to the completed podcast. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:28, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::I think that's reasonable. The transcriber(s) is(/are) still listed in the podcast text/top template, and the checkin and validation times could always be retrieved from history (not that they're terribly important pieces of info). I might wait a day to see if anybody else has any strong feelings about it and then trim out those lines for the completed ones. Maybe even move the completed podcasts to a "Completed Podcasts" heading, separate from the "Checkins"? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:32, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | ::::I think that's reasonable. The transcriber(s) is(/are) still listed in the podcast text/top template, and the checkin and validation times could always be retrieved from history (not that they're terribly important pieces of info). I might wait a day to see if anybody else has any strong feelings about it and then trim out those lines for the completed ones. Maybe even move the completed podcasts to a "Completed Podcasts" heading, separate from the "Checkins"? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:32, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
:::Obviously I'm a bit neutral to the idea. While I'm generally very pro-picture, the transcripts are generally stark areas of text, and I've grown used to that. I'd love to hear input from actual "users" of the transcripts, but I'm not sure if such creatures exist (judging from the hit counts). I'd lean towards "going for it", and if it's horribly awful and offensive to the senses it'd be a snap to wipe them out. There's not that many finished podcasts that'd need to be done. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:36, 28 September 2006 (CDT) | :::Obviously I'm a bit neutral to the idea. While I'm generally very pro-picture, the transcripts are generally stark areas of text, and I've grown used to that. I'd love to hear input from actual "users" of the transcripts, but I'm not sure if such creatures exist (judging from the hit counts). I'd lean towards "going for it", and if it's horribly awful and offensive to the senses it'd be a snap to wipe them out. There's not that many finished podcasts that'd need to be done. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:36, 28 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::I'd rather keep things spartan. --[[User: | ::::I'd rather keep things spartan. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:57, 28 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::I'm going to agree. Let's keep things spartan as possible. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:42, 28 September 2006 (CDT) | ::::I'm going to agree. Let's keep things spartan as possible. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:42, 28 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
Given that our podcast transcripts are being referenced in books, such as ''Cylons in America'', we may want to consider locking down the transcriptions once they've been verified. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 21:45, 13 January 2008 (CST) | Given that our podcast transcripts are being referenced in books, such as ''Cylons in America'', we may want to consider locking down the transcriptions once they've been verified. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 21:45, 13 January 2008 (CST) | ||
:No objections here. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 23:03, 13 January 2008 (CST) | :No objections here. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 23:03, 13 January 2008 (CST) | ||