Editing Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/JubalHarshaw
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]]=== | ===[[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]]=== | ||
* '''[{{fullurl:Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/JubalHarshaw|action=edit}} Vote here]''' | * '''[{{fullurl:Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/JubalHarshaw|action=edit}} Vote here]''' | ||
| Line 7: | Line 4: | ||
==== Votes ==== | ==== Votes ==== | ||
* '''Current Count:''' ( | * '''Current Count:''' (4/0/0) | ||
* '''Current Date/Time:''' {{CURRENTDAYNAME}}, {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}} at {{CURRENTTIME}} (UTC) | * '''Current Date/Time:''' {{CURRENTDAYNAME}}, {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}} at {{CURRENTTIME}} (UTC) | ||
* '''RFA Ending:''' {{dateahead|{{JD|2007|04 |14}}|7}} | * '''RFA Ending:''' {{dateahead|{{JD|2007|04 |14}}|7}} | ||
| Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
<!-- Use Template {{Support}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | <!-- Use Template {{Support}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | ||
# {{Support}} per nomination. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 18:22, 13 April 2007 (CDT) | # {{Support}} per nomination. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 18:22, 13 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
# {{Support}} One of my favorite contributors, and I look forward to seeing him made | # {{Support}} One of my favorite contributors, and I look forward to seeing him made and admin. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 22:44, 13 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
#{{Support}} Does good work --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:57, 14 April 2007 (CDT) | #{{Support}} Does good work --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:57, 14 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
#{{Support}} I have to admit I've been keeping my eye on JubalHarshaw for adminship for a while now. There's no question that he makes the kind of edits that need to be made. The only thing I was waiting on was if he stuck around with us, and he's done so. I'd be proud to have him mopping these halls. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:40, 14 April 2007 (CDT) | #{{Support}} I have to admit I've been keeping my eye on JubalHarshaw for adminship for a while now. There's no question that he makes the kind of edits that need to be made. The only thing I was waiting on was if he stuck around with us, and he's done so. I'd be proud to have him mopping these halls. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:40, 14 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
<!-- Use Template {{Oppose}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | <!-- Use Template {{Oppose}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | ||
| Line 51: | Line 44: | ||
:'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? | :'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? | ||
::A. My time here has been almost completely without strife. Which is more than I can say for my time with Wikipedia. It's amazing how many "wikipedians" there become attached to articles (and take edits personally). I've seen so little of that here, it cheers me. Most discourse is almost always concerned with how to improve articles, above and beyond any personalities or politics. If a conflict arose, I would trust to my judgement, the judgement of the other admins/'crats, and the judgement of the community, to help diffuse and find an acceptable solution within our framework of policies, and also through human judgement (no rules set in stone are ever as effective as the human mind, which can adapt and judge on a far more distinct and intelligent level than "zero tolerance"). | ::A. My time here has been almost completely without strife. Which is more than I can say for my time with Wikipedia. It's amazing how many "wikipedians" there become attached to articles (and take edits personally). I've seen so little of that here, it cheers me. Most discourse is almost always concerned with how to improve articles, above and beyond any personalities or politics. If a conflict arose, I would trust to my judgement, the judgement of the other admins/'crats, and the judgement of the community, to help diffuse and find an acceptable solution within our framework of policies, and also through human judgement (no rules set in stone are ever as effective as the human mind, which can adapt and judge on a far more distinct and intelligent level than "zero tolerance"). | ||