Editing Battlestar Wiki:Please do not bite the newcomers
From the only original and legitimate Battlestar Wiki: the free-as-in-beer, non-corporate, open-content encyclopedia, analytical reference, and episode guide on all things Battlestar Galactica. Accept neither subpar substitutes nor subpar clones.
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Policy | {{Proposed Policy|shortcut=BW:BITE<br/>BW:NEWBIES<br/>BW:DBTN}} | ||
{{derivative2| INTERWIKI=Wikipedia| | {{derivative2| INTERWIKI=Wikipedia| | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
LICENSE=GNU FDL }} | LICENSE=GNU FDL }} | ||
'''New contributors are prospective "members" and are therefore our most valuable resource. We must treat newcomers with kindness and patience—nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility or elitism. While many newcomers hit the ground running, some lack knowledge about the way we do things. | '''New contributors are prospective "members" and are therefore our most valuable resource. We must treat newcomers with kindness and patience — nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility or elitism. While many newcomers hit the ground running, some lack knowledge about the way we do things.''' | ||
== Please do '''NOT''' bite the newcomers == | == Please do '''NOT''' bite the newcomers == | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Whilst it is fine to point a new user, who has made a mistake, towards relevant guidance it is out of order to suggest that they stop taking part in votes, [[BW:RFA | RFA]] and [[BW:RFC|RFC]] discussions, etc. until they "gain more experience". This both discourages the new editor and may deprive Battlestar Wiki of much needed insights. | * Whilst it is fine to point a new user, who has made a mistake, towards relevant guidance it is out of order to suggest that they stop taking part in votes, [[BW:RFA | RFA]] and [[BW:RFC|RFC]] discussions, etc. until they "gain more experience". This both discourages the new editor and may deprive Battlestar Wiki of much needed insights. | ||
* When giving advice to newcomers, tone down the rhetoric even a few notches from the usual mellow discourse that dominates Battlestar Wiki. Make the newcomer feel genuinely welcome, not as though they must win your approval in order to be granted membership into an exclusive club. Any new domain of concentrated, special-purpose human activity has its own specialized strictures and structures, which take time to learn, and which benefit from periodic re-examination and revision | * When giving advice to newcomers, tone down the rhetoric even a few notches from the usual mellow discourse that dominates Battlestar Wiki. Make the newcomer feel genuinely welcome, not as though they must win your approval in order to be granted membership into an exclusive club. Any new domain of concentrated, special-purpose human activity has its own specialized strictures and structures, which take time to learn, and which benefit from periodic re-examination and revision. | ||
* Do not call newcomers disparaging names, such as "[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppets|meatpuppet]]". If a lot of newcomers show up on one side of a vote, you should make them feel welcome while explaining that their votes may be disregarded. No name-calling is necessary. | * Do not call newcomers disparaging names, such as "[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppets|meatpuppet]]". If a lot of newcomers show up on one side of a vote, you should make them feel welcome while explaining that their votes may be disregarded. No name-calling is necessary. | ||