Editing Battlestar Wiki:Galactipedians Quorum/Archive4
From the only original and legitimate Battlestar Wiki: the free-as-in-beer, non-corporate, open-content encyclopedia, analytical reference, and episode guide on all things Battlestar Galactica. Accept neither subpar substitutes nor subpar clones.
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive-message | {{archive-message | ||
| start = September | | start = September 28, 2006 | ||
| end = October 10, 2006 | | end = October 10, 2006 | ||
| newarchive = 04 | | newarchive = 04 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Template works in Wikipedia, but not in Battlestar Wiki ... Why?== | ==Template works in Wikipedia, but not in Battlestar Wiki ... Why?== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 25: | ||
Seriously thinking about writing our own "essay" about it and why it should be avoid at all cost at Battlestar Wiki. Just something that can be referenced internally. Thoughts? --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 14:46, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | Seriously thinking about writing our own "essay" about it and why it should be avoid at all cost at Battlestar Wiki. Just something that can be referenced internally. Thoughts? --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 14:46, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
: Good idea. Once you're done, dunk it in the Tank. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 15:39, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | : Good idea. Once you're done, dunk it in the Tank. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 15:39, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:By all means. --[[User: | :By all means. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:16, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Huh? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 22:11, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | :Huh? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 22:11, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:: [[w:Fanwank|Here is what Frankie's referring to.]] -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 22:15, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | :: [[w:Fanwank|Here is what Frankie's referring to.]] -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 22:15, 1 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 40: | Line 32: | ||
:::::Here's what I have so far [[User:Gougef/Fanwanking]]. I know it's "harsh." --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 09:09, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | :::::Here's what I have so far [[User:Gougef/Fanwanking]]. I know it's "harsh." --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 09:09, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::Looks great so far, actually. I want to crosslink with this and the [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad]] subsection on derived content to warn people not to confuse that with fanwankery, which is wholly unsubstantiated. I'll add a bit for that.--[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:46, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::::Looks great so far, actually. I want to crosslink with this and the [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad]] subsection on derived content to warn people not to confuse that with fanwankery, which is wholly unsubstantiated. I'll add a bit for that.--[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:46, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::::::It's going a little far to say that fanwaking is completely forbidden. A certain amount of speculation is appropriate (take, for example, [[Articles of Colonization]] - the simplest explanation would be that the producers messed up referred to article 21 instead of 23 by mistake. However, the situation was different enough that Tyrol could plausibly have been invoking different rights in each case). It only becomes problematic when we concoct patently inplausible scenarios to excuse what are obviously production errors. --[[User: | :::::::It's going a little far to say that fanwaking is completely forbidden. A certain amount of speculation is appropriate (take, for example, [[Articles of Colonization]] - the simplest explanation would be that the producers messed up referred to article 21 instead of 23 by mistake. However, the situation was different enough that Tyrol could plausibly have been invoking different rights in each case). It only becomes problematic when we concoct patently inplausible scenarios to excuse what are obviously production errors. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:28, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::::Want me to put it in the tink tank has a mutual proposal to be worked on? As a recovering fanwanker ;), I know I was probably being too harsh. Thanks for the great ideas. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 18:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::::::Want me to put it in the tink tank has a mutual proposal to be worked on? As a recovering fanwanker ;), I know I was probably being too harsh. Thanks for the great ideas. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 18:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||