Editing Battlestar Wiki:Galactipedians Quorum/Archive2
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
:Ah, I don't see it as more than a single ''faux pas''. The end (apologing in proxy for others who personally insult someone to the point of slander on a internet site) justified the means (albeit unkosher). Given the harsh tone done by the contributors on the subject, I'd say it was the right thing to do. I don't feel you need to be busted down to take [[User:Day|Mop Boy]]'s job or anything (yet. ;) --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:20, 1 May 2006 (CDT) | :Ah, I don't see it as more than a single ''faux pas''. The end (apologing in proxy for others who personally insult someone to the point of slander on a internet site) justified the means (albeit unkosher). Given the harsh tone done by the contributors on the subject, I'd say it was the right thing to do. I don't feel you need to be busted down to take [[User:Day|Mop Boy]]'s job or anything (yet. ;) --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:20, 1 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I do not want to drag this up again as it was resolved, and I agree that it inappropriate for anyone to act as sole spokesperson. However, my accusation against KR was at the time a believe based on facts available to me at the time, and I believed in them. **However, when I got pointed towards more information which dispelled the belief I had developed because of the earlier one, and it was clearly established that KR was a reliable source, things changed: rather than flying into a rage or adamantly declaring that I was right and would "stay the course" despite all the info, I changed my position, admitted my positiion was wrong (as there were things I didn't know) and appologized, and retracted the whole thing. This was resolved, and to be honest, more amicably than I had hoped. More to the point, before KR responded everyone here voted that they agreed with my (previous) position. I think this was all just a bad incident we need to learn from, developing our spoilers tags more and so forth, and I think we're making good progress discussing that. The kinks a Wiki site going through as it grows and becomes a mature full fledged site. At no time did I feel that | ::I do not want to drag this up again as it was resolved, and I agree that it inappropriate for anyone to act as sole spokesperson. However, my accusation against KR was at the time a believe based on facts available to me at the time, and I believed in them. **However, when I got pointed towards more information which dispelled the belief I had developed because of the earlier one, and it was clearly established that KR was a reliable source, things changed: rather than flying into a rage or adamantly declaring that I was right and would "stay the course" despite all the info, I changed my position, admitted my positiion was wrong (as there were things I didn't know) and appologized, and retracted the whole thing. This was resolved, and to be honest, more amicably than I had hoped. More to the point, before KR responded everyone here voted that they agreed with my (previous) position. I think this was all just a bad incident we need to learn from, developing our spoilers tags more and so forth, and I think we're making good progress discussing that. The kinks a Wiki site going through as it grows and becomes a mature full fledged site. At no time did I feel that Peter is or has been out of line; he needs give no appology :) officer and a gentleman all the way. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 14:38, 1 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
: | : Peter, I have no problem with what you did. If I had problems with what you did, you would have known well before now. The problem was solved and everyone came to an agreement. Kudos! -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 22:21, 1 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Nevertheless, it needed to be said for the benefit of the community in general. I'm glad this whole situation is close to resolution. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 22:41, 1 May 2006 (CDT) | ::Nevertheless, it needed to be said for the benefit of the community in general. I'm glad this whole situation is close to resolution. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 22:41, 1 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
:I don't see the need for this either. Relationships are currently discussed on character bio pages and within the context of the race article - do we have anything interesting to say about relationships on BSG in general? They all seem very conventional. There are no weird Minbari Mating Rituals to document, for example. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 01:22, 7 June 2006 (CDT) | :I don't see the need for this either. Relationships are currently discussed on character bio pages and within the context of the race article - do we have anything interesting to say about relationships on BSG in general? They all seem very conventional. There are no weird Minbari Mating Rituals to document, for example. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 01:22, 7 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I tend to agree with | :I tend to agree with Peter, although we shouldn't discount the weirdness that happens when ''anyone'' on this show hooks up. From half-robobabies, glowing spines, and ghosts, it's something to talk about, although I'll be damned if I know ''what to say'' beyond what we have already. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:16, 12 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
== Quorum Definintion == | == Quorum Definintion == | ||