Editing Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for October 2006
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== [[The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game]] == | == [[The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game]] == | ||
* {{oppose}}. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}}. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}}. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --[[User: | * {{oppose}}. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}} --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}} --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}} I nominated it only as a joke. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}} I nominated it only as a joke. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== [[Cylon agent]] == | == [[Cylon agent]] == | ||
*Comment - could use some information currently hosted in [[Cylon Models]]. --[[User: | *Comment - could use some information currently hosted in [[Cylon Models]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
*Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | *Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* Comment: I love the theory here. Blows [[Wikipedia:Warp drive|warp drive]] out of the water. But... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * Comment: I love the theory here. Blows [[Wikipedia:Warp drive|warp drive]] out of the water. But... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}}. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --[[User: | * {{oppose}}. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:14, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{support}}. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{support}}. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}}. I see April's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}}. I see April's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||