Editing Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for June 2006
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==[[Computers]]== | ==[[Computers]]== | ||
*<strike> | *<strike>Very detailed about the information given about the computer systems. A+ article.</strike> Changed vote to [[Galactica (RDM)]]. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 14:58, 3 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
** | **I'm not sure if people would be very interested in this. Compared to like "Number Six" "Adama" or "Galactica"--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 15:44, 3 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
** | ** A+++!!!!!1!1!!!!!11!!!11onethree WOULD ATICKLE AGN11!! *wink* --[[User:Day|Day]] <sup>([[User talk:Day|Talk]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|Admin]])</sup> 23:54, 3 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
* | * I can see where Merv is coming from on this. It's a very tech-centric piece, for a show that's not supposed to be as much about the tech. The article is definitely sharp (I like the new table layout of the pics with the text), and appeals to me as a computer scientist, but I realize that not everbody is interested in computers. That being said, I can't think of any "character" articles off the top of my head that stand out. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:12, 6 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
==[[Resurrection Ship]]== | ==[[Resurrection Ship]]== | ||