| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Comments ==
| | {{support}}. I support any and all of the quality Silly pages listed for Featured Article status! =) I know that doesn't really help choose ''one'' ... I'll try! [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 11:55, 22 December 2006 (CST) |
| More votes, please. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:17, 5 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| | |
| ==Flashlight==
| |
| *{{support}}. As per my usual. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 00:24, 24 December 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| *{{support}}. I support any and all of the quality Silly pages listed for Featured Article status! =) I know that doesn't really help choose ''one'' ... I'll try! [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 11:55, 22 December 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| == Battle of the Resurrection Ship ==
| |
| *{{support}}. Its well fleshed out, it was an important event, and frankly, its not a silly article. We haven't run out of good ones yet, so maybe we should wait to go to silly ones. --[[User:Hobbesy|Hobbesy]] 22:10, 26 December 2006 (CST)
| |
| *{{support}} [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 07:20, 5 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| *{{support}} The battle pages are some of the best articles on the wiki. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:54, 5 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| *{{support}} Casualties: 4. Wow. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:06, 5 January 2007 (CST)
| |