| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==[[New Caprican loco weed]]== | | ==[[New Caprican loco weed]]== |
| {{support}} Drug-related brilliance! --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:30, 8 January 2007 (CST) | | {{support}} Drug-related brilliance! --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:30, 8 January 2007 (CST) |
|
| |
| {{support}} How could I not support an article I initially created? Having said that, any of the candidates are worthy. Even [[Adamastache]] (whose several redlinks cry out for additional facial-hair related Silly pages.) [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 15:06, 8 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| :Yeah, I'd particularly like to see a Sexy Treason Stubble article. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 16:58, 8 January 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| ==[[Sharon Agathon]]==
| |
| {{support}} One of the best articles around. [[User:Sloan|Sloan]] 11:34, 15 January 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| {{support}} Looks good to me. [[User:MatthewFenton|MatthewFenton]] 11:38, 15 January 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| {{support}} Agree. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 11:40, 15 January 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| {{support}} Yeah, I like this one. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 11:45, 15 January 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| {{support}} Not a fan of silly pages, and the article is very, very good by itself --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:34, 21 January 2007 (CST)
| |
| :If you don't mind my asking, why don't you like silly pages? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:58, 21 January 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| {{support}} By far one of the top key characters on the show. Well developed article. --[[User:Hobbesy|Hobbesy]] 23:41, 2 February 2007 (CST)
| |
