Editing Battlestar Wiki:FAQ/Content
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Furthermore, fan fiction is often contradictory and open to various interpretations, not to mention the fact that most mainstream fans are mainly unconcerned with its presence. Therefore, the decision was made in its inception not to cover fan fiction or any content that the fans have created. | Furthermore, fan fiction is often contradictory and open to various interpretations, not to mention the fact that most mainstream fans are mainly unconcerned with its presence. Therefore, the decision was made in its inception not to cover fan fiction or any content that the fans have created. | ||
We have, however, created a means to create or post fan fiction, via our sister | We have, however, created a means to create or post fan fiction, via our sister sites: [[bsp:|BattlestarPegasus.com]] and [[frakr:|Wiki Frakr]] (the satirical version of Battlestar Wiki). | ||
== Why don't you have more information on [this] or [that]? == | == Why don't you have more information on [this] or [that]? == | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Battlestar Wiki is voluntarily built by fans, like yourself, and people tend to edit or create what they like to create. | Battlestar Wiki is voluntarily built by fans, like yourself, and people tend to edit or create what they like to create. | ||
Beyond the desire to help the | Beyond the desire to help the protect, people are not financially reimbursed for the time or effort they put into the website. Therefore, there are not people who edit the wiki 24 hours a day, 7 days a week... they edit when they can, adding or editing as much as they want. | ||
As most people tend to stick with subjects that they like, it is logical, then, that people will doubtless edit articles on those kinds of topics. Each contributor has their own calling, and no two (or more) callings are the same, and thus the Wiki is built with the help of many people of different inclinations. | As most people tend to stick with subjects that they like, it is logical, then, that people will doubtless edit articles on those kinds of topics. Each contributor has their own calling, and no two (or more) callings are the same, and thus the Wiki is built with the help of many people of different inclinations. | ||
So if something is "missing" from our encyclopedia, and you'd like to see it added, then you are more than welcome to join us and add such information on this yourself. And don't worry about messing up, since there's a safety net in place to fix things as they were. | So if something is "missing" from our encyclopedia, and you'd like to see it added, then you are more than welcome to join us and add such information on this yourself. And don't worry about messing up, since there's a safety net in place to fix things as they were. | ||
== Why don't you just cover [this version of Battlestar Galactica] instead of [those other versions]? == | == Why don't you just cover [this version of Battlestar Galactica] instead of [those other versions]? == | ||
Battlestar Wiki's prime directive is to cover ''everything'' officially related to ''Battlestar Galactica'', regardless of fans | Battlestar Wiki's prime directive is to cover ''everything'' officially related to ''Battlestar Galactica'', regardless of fans viewpoints on any of the series. | ||
We are not interested in pandering to just one group of fans, and have found that most fans relish in being able to understand all the series, even if they themselves have certain preferences. | We are not interested in pandering to just one group of fans, and have found that most fans relish in being able to understand all the series, even if they themselves have certain preferences. | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
One problem with spoilers is that they are sometimes partly or even entirely wrong, or misleading, which makes their inclusion questionable. Even if they are true, the content later needs to be re-written to reflect what is actually shown on screen. Thus keeping the spoiler content confined to a few pages - instead of including them on all related articles - cuts down on the work needed to keep the articles up to date. | One problem with spoilers is that they are sometimes partly or even entirely wrong, or misleading, which makes their inclusion questionable. Even if they are true, the content later needs to be re-written to reflect what is actually shown on screen. Thus keeping the spoiler content confined to a few pages - instead of including them on all related articles - cuts down on the work needed to keep the articles up to date. | ||
{{faq navigation}} | {{faq navigation}} | ||