No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How about "celestial bodies" instead of "planets"? That way we can include the nebulae in as well. Just a thought... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:08, 5 December 2007 (CST) | How about "celestial bodies" instead of "planets"? That way we can include the nebulae in as well. Just a thought... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:08, 5 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:Not a bad idea :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:19, 5 December 2007 (CST) | :Not a bad idea :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:19, 5 December 2007 (CST) | ||
::I'm not sure: one, it's not quite as catchy, two, the nebulae is a different sort of entity, being that people can set foot on all the planets (i.e. they're potential sites for action that aren't in the fleet). [[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:58, 5 December 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 00:58, 6 December 2007
How about "celestial bodies" instead of "planets"? That way we can include the nebulae in as well. Just a thought... -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 16:08, 5 December 2007 (CST)
- Not a bad idea :) --Serenity 16:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)
- I'm not sure: one, it's not quite as catchy, two, the nebulae is a different sort of entity, being that people can set foot on all the planets (i.e. they're potential sites for action that aren't in the fleet). OTW 18:58, 5 December 2007 (CST)