Talk:List of all episodes/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:34, 11 February 2005

Season Two Comments[edit]

Sci-Fi just officially announced the second season of BSG has been confirmed, thank the Lords of Kobol! Kuralyov 18:06, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)

Frakin' A[edit]

About time they got off their business suited asses and did something right for a change. :-) --Joe Beaudoin 19:34, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)

Season 2 was more-or-less on the cards: the UK ratings cambined with international interest shown via bulletin boards, etc., demonstrated Universal had a market for the show; all that was needed were initial US ratings (hence the announcement after only 5 episodes aired,rather than hanging-fire and taking stock after the majority of the season had aired), to confirm the US domestic market.

--Colonial Archivist 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)

Episode Guide Comments[edit]

Is there any reason for the sub-headings ("Part I" and "Part II") under the mini-series in the episode guide list? Given the excellent analysis Joe has put together (with ample opportunity for additions on notes, etc.), the sub-heading appear redundant - epecially when the mini hasn't necessarily been aired in two parts in all markets. Such a split could also cause irritation should information be split between the two sub-articles (given the need for people to page back and forth). IF such a split is needed - why not simply include the two parts as sub-headings within the main mini-series article?

--Colonial Archivist 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Is there any reason for the sub-headings ("Part I" and "Part II") under the mini-series in the episode guide list? Given the excellent analysis Joe has put together (with ample opportunity for additions on notes, etc.), the sub-heading appear redundant - epecially when the mini hasn't '''necessarily'' been aired in two parts in  all markets. Such a split could also cause irritation should information be split between the two sub-articles (given the need for people to page back and forth). IF such a split is needed - why not simply include the two parts as sub-headings '''within''' the main mini-series article?
+==Season Two Comments==
---[[User:Ernestborg9|Colonial Archivist]] 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)
+Sci-Fi just officially announced the second season of BSG has been confirmed, thank the Lords of Kobol! [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 18:06, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)
+=== Frakin' A ===
+About time they got off their business suited asses and did something right for a change.  :-) --[[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 19:34, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)
@@ Line 8: / Line 12: @@
 --[[User:Ernestborg9|Colonial Archivist]] 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)
-Sci-Fi just officially announced the second season of BSG has been confirmed, thank the Lords of Kobol! [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 18:06, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)
-== Frakin' A ==
+==Episode Guide Comments==
+Is there any reason for the sub-headings ("Part I" and "Part II") under the mini-series in the episode guide list? Given the excellent analysis Joe has put together (with ample opportunity for additions on notes, etc.), the sub-heading appear redundant - epecially when the mini hasn't '''necessarily''' been aired in two parts in  all markets. Such a split could also cause irritation should information be split between the two sub-articles (given the need for people to page back and forth). IF such a split is needed - why not simply include the two parts as sub-headings '''within''' the main mini-series article?
-About time they got off their business suited asses and did something right for a change.  :-) --[[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 19:34, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)
+--[[User:Ernestborg9|Colonial Archivist]] 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)