Talk:Galactica Discovers Earth, Part I/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Galactica Discovers Earth, Part I/Archive 1
(New section: DVD Updates)
(→‎Reference No. 3: new section)
Line 5: Line 5:


Wow, I hate to admit it, but I actually enjoyed watching this episode and updating the summary. And now, it's time for me to put the spoon down that I'd planned to use to gouge my eyes out. Figure I won't need it until "The Super Scouts." --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 22:29, 26 December 2007 (CST)
Wow, I hate to admit it, but I actually enjoyed watching this episode and updating the summary. And now, it's time for me to put the spoon down that I'd planned to use to gouge my eyes out. Figure I won't need it until "The Super Scouts." --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 22:29, 26 December 2007 (CST)
== Reference No. 3 ==
I don't know how to edit references, but reference 3 has a link to 'Continuity errors (TOS)', and not 'Continuity errors (1980)'.  As I said, I would edit it myself, but I don't seem to be able to.  Thanks.  [[User:Danage|Danage]] 12:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:03, 10 December 2009

Episode Summary Template

I tried to format this close to the episode template that the RDM and TOS pages follow (similar to the Lurker's guide, I think). However, in this case I didn't yet restore all the missing sections ("official statements, analysis, questions"). Should I go ahead and add those sections back, even though they'll likely remain mostly blank? --Steelviper 09:47, 4 January 2006 (EST)

DVD Updates

Wow, I hate to admit it, but I actually enjoyed watching this episode and updating the summary. And now, it's time for me to put the spoon down that I'd planned to use to gouge my eyes out. Figure I won't need it until "The Super Scouts." --Spencerian 22:29, 26 December 2007 (CST)

Reference No. 3

I don't know how to edit references, but reference 3 has a link to 'Continuity errors (TOS)', and not 'Continuity errors (1980)'. As I said, I would edit it myself, but I don't seem to be able to. Thanks. Danage 12:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)