Talk:Continuity errors (RDM)/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Continuity errors (RDM)/Archive2
m (Archiving 1 thread(s) from Talk:Continuity errors (RDM).)
m (Archiving 1 thread(s) from Talk:Continuity errors (RDM).)
Line 11: Line 11:
:::Sorry about that. I meant to link to [[/Archive1|this]]. There was also a Think Tank quite a while back as well, which I'm too lazy to go back and find just this moment. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 21:30, 8 December 2007 (CST)
:::Sorry about that. I meant to link to [[/Archive1|this]]. There was also a Think Tank quite a while back as well, which I'm too lazy to go back and find just this moment. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 21:30, 8 December 2007 (CST)
::::OK. Considering nobody's objected in the last few months, I'm going to take down the tag.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 08:30, 9 December 2007 (CST)
::::OK. Considering nobody's objected in the last few months, I'm going to take down the tag.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 08:30, 9 December 2007 (CST)
== Getting Lengthy ==
Too long? Just throwing it out for discussion, have no opinion right now. -- [[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 22:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
: I think so. It might serve us to refactor this page... Just not sure how to do that exactly. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 23:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:A bit maybe, but I think it's still manageable. There are longer pages, and this article is difficult to split up. Splitting by seasons is not possible, and going by sections wouldn't work well either. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 23:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:: It just seems hard to read. I was the catalyst of the current layout, but like Joe, I am at a lost on what to do. It evolved this way to get the continuity discussions (which are really a "real world" debate) out of the episode articles. -- [[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 23:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:00, 8 April 2008

Archive
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.


Acknowledged mistakes

Why are the standards for this page lower than for all other Wiki pages? If you state something as a fact, and it isn't supported by anything else, you need to give a reference. Who acknowledged the mistake of the position of the Lagoon Nebula? In the podcast for home part 2, RDM and Eick, as I recall, did acknowledge that the constellations themselves would not all be simultaneously visible from any point on Earth. My suspicion is that this is the support for saying that the Lagoon Nebula mistake was acknowledged... but it does not follow. --MHall 12:36, 13 October 2007 (CDT)

What's the NPOV dispute?

Can't see what the objection is, why the tag? OTW 18:50, 8 December 2007 (CST)

I think this has something to do with this. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 19:45, 8 December 2007 (CST)
That's a citation issue, not an NPOV issue. --Peter Farago 21:21, 8 December 2007 (CST)
Sorry about that. I meant to link to this. There was also a Think Tank quite a while back as well, which I'm too lazy to go back and find just this moment. :) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 21:30, 8 December 2007 (CST)
OK. Considering nobody's objected in the last few months, I'm going to take down the tag.OTW 08:30, 9 December 2007 (CST)

Getting Lengthy

Too long? Just throwing it out for discussion, have no opinion right now. -- FrankieG 22:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I think so. It might serve us to refactor this page... Just not sure how to do that exactly. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 23:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
A bit maybe, but I think it's still manageable. There are longer pages, and this article is difficult to split up. Splitting by seasons is not possible, and going by sections wouldn't work well either. -- Serenity 23:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
It just seems hard to read. I was the catalyst of the current layout, but like Joe, I am at a lost on what to do. It evolved this way to get the continuity discussions (which are really a "real world" debate) out of the episode articles. -- FrankieG 23:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)