Talk:Baah Pakal/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Baah Pakal/Archive 1
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
CLosed cationing said it was the Baah Pahkala. I'm not sure on the spelling of the second part if the h is there or not, but I'm sure on the separation of the words. -- [[User:YeNguyen|YeNguyen]], 24 Sept 2005, 10:21
CLosed cationing said it was the Baah Pakal (Pahkal?). I'm not sure on the spelling of the second part if the h is there or not, but I'm sure on the separation of the words. -- [[User:YeNguyen|YeNguyen]], 24 Sept 2005, 10:21

Revision as of 21:20, 25 September 2005

CLosed cationing said it was the Baah Pakal (Pahkal?). I'm not sure on the spelling of the second part if the h is there or not, but I'm sure on the separation of the words. -- YeNguyen, 24 Sept 2005, 10:21