Talk:Atlantia Class Battlestar/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Atlantia Class Battlestar/Archive 1
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


This is almost certainly fanon. For a start the figures provided for the length are too long. And it would make no sence if the flagship was an old cheap class. But get this by season 3 (when the valk first appeared) zoic was no longer working on the show. [[User:JosephK19|JosephK19]] 07:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
This is almost certainly fanon. For a start the figures provided for the length are too long. And it would make no sence if the flagship was an old cheap class. But get this by season 3 (when the valk first appeared) zoic was no longer working on the show. [[User:JosephK19|JosephK19]] 07:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
== Why is the page protected ==
  Why is the page protected but still can be edited?
--[[User:Philyboy|P sutherland]] 21:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:02, 10 June 2009

were did that come from?

Were did you get that. I think this page should be deleted.--P sutherland 18:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Ditto. I'm on it now. There is absolutely no evidence presently available of this being the case. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 21:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

ya I was 99% sure that the Valkyries class was never mentioned. Can you delete the page right away before some people get confused? --P sutherland 22:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

The contributor noted that the information was provided to us by Zoic... I've asked for confirmation before I delete it outright. As of right now, however, the page shouldn't link to anything so there's no rush to delete it. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 22:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

This is almost certainly fanon. For a start the figures provided for the length are too long. And it would make no sence if the flagship was an old cheap class. But get this by season 3 (when the valk first appeared) zoic was no longer working on the show. JosephK19 07:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


Why is the page protected

 Why is the page protected but still can be edited?

--P sutherland 21:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)