Talk:101/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of 101/Archive 1
(Created page with '== Same episode number between TRS and CAP == Hi,<br/>There will be soon a problem with the episode number redirect pages between The Re-imagined Series and ''[[Caprica (ser…')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Same episode number between TRS and CAP ==
== Same episode number between TRS and CAP ==


Hi,<br/>There will be soon a problem with the episode number redirect pages between [[The Re-imagined Series]] and ''[[Caprica (series)|Caprica]]'' because both series have the same episode number for Season One (for the moment). These redirect pages are used especially for the Characters appearance for the series and with this, we cannot make any difference between TRS and CAP or we cannot create a Characters appearance page for ''Caprica''. Is it planned to find a way to create a different mark for this? --[[User:LIMAFOX76|LIMAFOX76]] 11:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,<br/>There will be soon a problem with the episode number redirect pages between [[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)|The Re-imagined Series]] and ''[[Caprica (series)|Caprica]]'' because both series have the same episode number for Season One (for the moment). These redirect pages are used especially for the Characters appearance for the series and with this, we cannot make any difference between TRS and CAP or we cannot create a Characters appearance page for ''Caprica''. Is it planned to find a way to create a different mark for this? --[[User:LIMAFOX76|LIMAFOX76]] 11:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:02, 8 March 2010

Same episode number between TRS and CAP[edit]

Hi,
There will be soon a problem with the episode number redirect pages between The Re-imagined Series and Caprica because both series have the same episode number for Season One (for the moment). These redirect pages are used especially for the Characters appearance for the series and with this, we cannot make any difference between TRS and CAP or we cannot create a Characters appearance page for Caprica. Is it planned to find a way to create a different mark for this? --LIMAFOX76 11:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)