Battlestar Wiki talk:Why Battlestar Wiki doesn't use the GFDL: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Why Battlestar Wiki doesn't use the GFDL
(anochronistic) |
m (Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does the Creative Commons license forbid a GFDL source like wikipedia from using our contributions? --[[User: | Does the Creative Commons license forbid a GFDL source like wikipedia from using our contributions? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 18:24, 12 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
== Anachronistic == | == Anachronistic == | ||
Just as a note, it's not anachronistic so much as aimed elsewhere. Its real intention is technical manuals, particularly the documentation for corresponding GPL software. Such things don't have needs like allowing for fair use inclusions. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 21:23, 26 April 2006 (CDT) | Just as a note, it's not anachronistic so much as aimed elsewhere. Its real intention is technical manuals, particularly the documentation for corresponding GPL software. Such things don't have needs like allowing for fair use inclusions. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 21:23, 26 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Does the Creative Commons license forbid a GFDL source like wikipedia from using our contributions? --April Arcus 18:24, 12 September 2005 (EDT)
Anachronistic
Just as a note, it's not anachronistic so much as aimed elsewhere. Its real intention is technical manuals, particularly the documentation for corresponding GPL software. Such things don't have needs like allowing for fair use inclusions. --CalculatinAvatar 21:23, 26 April 2006 (CDT)